Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Das grosse Aufwachen

Channel

Das grosse Aufwachen

@dasgrosseAufwachen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-5,077 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190843074
TypeChannel
Username@dasgrosseAufwachen
Created9 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dasgrosseAufwachen

Growth

25,0792,540.56 August 2026 — 5,079 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,078 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,073 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,077 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,076 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,074 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,076 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,073 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,077 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,073 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,061 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -5,077. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 01:362-5,059
8 Sept 2026, 21:385,061-12
3 Sept 2026, 04:175,073-4
31 Aug 2026, 02:095,077+4
27 Aug 2026, 21:245,073-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:365,076-3
22 Aug 2026, 03:275,079+5
19 Aug 2026, 06:225,074-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:445,076-1
12 Aug 2026, 16:045,077+4
9 Aug 2026, 10:315,073-5
6 Aug 2026, 20:415,078-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:465,079first reading

Engagement

97 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 97 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 28m
Average length
24m 50s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 41 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2920.1%
💯2920.1%
2819.4%
🔥1611.1%
🙈96.25%
👌53.47%
🤬53.47%
🍾42.78%
👏42.78%
😁42.78%
🙉42.78%
🤡42.78%
🖕21.39%
🎅10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

„Demolition Man“ aus dem Jahr 1993 mit Sylvester Stallone und Wesley Snipes! ​Der Film ist im Rückblick der absolute Klassiker für genau diese Art von Zukunftsvision: Sylvester Stallone („John Spartan“) wird nach einem Kälteschlaf im Jahr 2032 in einer vermeintlich perfekten, völlig sterilisierten Utopie namens San Angeles wach. ​Dort gibt es genau das, was die jetzt mit uns vorhaben... ​Der „Verbal Morality Statu

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC168 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Was hier passiert ist, dass wir die nächsten Jahre erzogen werden auf Linie zu sein, oder Schwierigkeiten bekommen...

💯2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC174 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ich lerne noch, bestimmte Arten von Bildern zu erstellen, deshalb kann ich möglicherweise noch nicht genau das bereitstellen, wonach du suchst. Manche Anfragen verstoßen eventuell auch gegen meine Richtlinien. Wenn du mich nach etwas anderem fragen möchtest, sag es mir einfach! Warum?.. wegen welche Richtlinien? Du kannst mir kein schlafendes Schaf generieren? Der Begriff „Schlafschaf“ (oder im übertragenen Sinne d

2

11 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC170 viewsread 12 August 2026

Da wollte ich mir eben ein Schlafschaf von Gemini erstellen lassen, da sagt er/sie/es zu mir, sie kann mir das Bild nicht erstellen, da es gegen ihre Richtlinien verstößt, weil es Menschen diskriminiert, die von Kritikerseite als Schlafschafe, also als dumme Menschen, dargestellt werden...😁😁...

11 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC187 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hab mein Limit von 200 Gifs erreicht muss jetzt dafür bezahlen um ein GIF zu senden, wie geil ist das denn? 😀😀😀...

🤬2

11 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC183 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Die rechtlichen Instrumente im Krisen- oder Spannungsfall... ​Sicherstellungsgesetze und Notstandskompetenzen: Mit der Ausrufung eines Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfalls treten in Deutschland besondere, scharfe Gesetze in Kraft. Diese sind primär dafür gedacht, die staatliche Handlungsfähigkeit, die Logistik und die Sicherheit zu garantieren. ​Der Staat hat über Gesetze (wie das Telekommunikationsgesetz oder Notfa

💯3

11 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC178 viewsread 12 August 2026

Alles passt mal wieder zusammen und jetzt mal kurz zuhören : Ist jetzt nur ne These aber nicht völlig aus der Luft gegriffen... Mich würde es nicht wundern wenn alle YouTube Kanäle, die Richtung AFD senden, oder andere Desinformationen verbreiten, halt bald nicht mehr senden...und dann ist das Geschrei groß, aber nicht weil die Agenda kommt, sondern weil das Geld nicht mehr fließt...dann heißt es entweder du bist au

11 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC184 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Wisst ihr eigentlich was sie die ganze Zeit gemacht haben? Sie haben euch verarscht, euch hingehalten, euch Zeit geklaut, euren Widerstand zerstört, falls er da war und sie haben alles vorbereitet, was für einen Systemwechsel von Nöten ist und jetzt haben wir genug gequatscht, denn auch das wird uns bald verboten werden... Willkommen in der Realität...

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @dasgrosseAufwachen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Epoch Times Deutsch
@epochtimesde · 30,730
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Das grosse Aufwachen” (@dasgrosseAufwachen), 2 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dasgrosseAufwachen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.