Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dasai

Channel

Dasai

@dasai_dazai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002548385970
TypeChannel
Username@dasai_dazai
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 October 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/dasai_dazai

Growth

1221261247 August 2026 — 126 subscribers15 August 2026 — 125 subscribers23 August 2026 — 123 subscribers30 August 2026 — 124 subscribers8 September 2026 — 122 subscribers15 September 2026 — 124 subscribers9 October 2026 — 124 subscribers11 October 2026 — 123 subscribers1237 August 202611 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 65 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 06:16123-1
9 Oct 2026, 20:22124no change
15 Sept 2026, 23:19124+2
8 Sept 2026, 03:55122-2
30 Aug 2026, 00:56124+1
23 Aug 2026, 11:26123-2
15 Aug 2026, 15:25125-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:09126first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.8%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
139
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held16 (3 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total555
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀4916.3%
custom 53436212883111505664715.6%
custom 53102161364894512553712.3%
custom 5343830702326567126299.63%
custom 5384266646892328972289.30%
✍247.97%
custom 5343922056280954236175.65%
💅165.32%
custom 5343645623595851778134.32%
custom 5235471911558854982103.32%
custom 5344049603924743386103.32%
custom 534363878171294604392.99%
🎉82.66%
🆒20.664%
🎃20.664%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dasai_dazai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC68 views16 reactions1 Starread 9 October 2026
Photo

Знаете, с августа я сошла с ума по bjd blind box. При этом я вообще не такой человек, как коллекционеры фигурок. Я нитакуся. Мне прям стрем от фоток комнат, где всё завалено мерчом, везде стеллажи, фигурки, тематические полки и алтари. Хотя сейчас это, видимо, респект у крутых подростков. Во мне с августа борются два волка. Один ненавидит колхоз, визуальный шум и уважает минимализм и стиль. Второму просто нравитс…

custom 523547191155885498210👀4🎉2

6 Oct 2026, 10:57 UTC81 views22 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Выход оое на свитч ( с поддержкой английского языка) запланирован на 24 декабря, 2026

👀14✍4🎉4

2 Oct 2026, 09:55 UTC144 views16 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

2 глава манги ООЕ на китайском можно посмотреть тут: http://xhslink.com/o/AXCKfkejYC8

👀14custom 53438307023265671262

19 Sept 2026, 21:50 UTC262 views15 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Дада, это не фанфик 🙏 Взяла кадр отсюда

👀13🎃2

10 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC327 views16 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Тут можно посмотреть сканы 1 главы манги по ООЕ на китайском языке http://xhslink.com/o/5PCjBlnvF73 http://xhslink.com/o/1UU5b8Vhq67 2 часть http://xhslink.com/o/2zZ4FLdnuFG 3 часть http://xhslink.com/o/AH5lRJ4pei2

✍16

5 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC364 views15 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Вывод: учим языки и записываемся ко мне на занятия по японскому ☺️

custom 534404960392474338610custom 53436456235958517785

5 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC322 views15 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @ukiyoeverydayPhoto

Эксмо переводит японские книги с помощью ИИ? Я не знаю. Но Анна Слащёва нашла кошмарное количество фактических ошибок в переводе одной из недавних книг Маюми Инабы "Утро без Мии". Чтобы вы понимали уровень пробитого дна в этой книге: в русском переводе женщина по имени Сико, которая в оригинале прямо называется 女性 и отдельно подчеркивается что она не имеет родственников (身寄りのない), превратилась в СОБАКУ! Весь текст …

custom 53436387817129460439✍4🎉2

4 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC265 views25 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 534362128831115056615custom 53102161364894512558custom 53438307023265671262

4 Sept 2026, 14:55 UTC274 views25 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

По ООЕ начали публиковать серийную мангу в журнале Young Ace Журнал вышел в продажу 4 сентября. В сети уже можно увидеть пару страниц из манги. Адаптация рута Ариаке ( ес) — 大穢 ~有明篇~ Художник — @ medamayaki51537 художник фонов — @ Nac_hya

💅15custom 53438307023265671268custom 53436212883111505662

21 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC400 views11 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

В отпуске были планы пройти вн, почитать спокойно корейские новеллы, но жизнь внесла коррективы. Много училась, много делала бытовых штук. А из увлечений был сильный гиперфикс на бжд. Купила много штук и планирую взять еще. Залипаю жестко на ленту в rednote и смотрю на бжд. Даже теперь расстроена, что выходит много бжд мужиков. Я нищая для такого А хотела давно показать новый проект по бжд. Там уже срач у китайцев…

custom 53436456235958517787👀4

20 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC341 views21 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Визуальная новелла Ooe в получит локализацию на английский, китайский и корейский языки издательством Dramatic Create в этом году. Выйдет игра на Nintendo Switch. Из дополнений/расширений: 🔸локализация 🔸дополнительный эпизод 🔸возможность включить озвучку персонажа Хинодэ Ранее компания MangaGamer объявила, что выпустит версию R18 на английском языке

custom 531021613648945125517custom 53436212883111505662custom 53438307023265671262

27 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC474 views14 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Не хочу быть bjd блогером ( смеемся, это шутка), но боже мои две клетки мозга уже несколько месяцев думают и мониторят процесс производства выпуска 3 китайский серий блайндбоксов с мужланами 😏 На днях заказала только вышедшую серию и жду И я прям жду как в мемах с курьером. Для скрашивания этого ожидания решила поискать фото/видео счастливых покупателей И жесть это фото. Почему я ранее не видела resemblance? 😦 Во…

custom 531021613648945125510custom 53438307023265671263custom 53436456235958517781

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dasai_dazai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dasai” (@dasai_dazai), 123 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dasai_dazai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.