Channel
@darwin_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,490subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001409921689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darwin_tg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darwin_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 9,490 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 9,504 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 9,517 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 9,519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 9,519 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
😱 Ark Invest just dropped some wild numbers In 2025, AI-generated words officially outnumbered words written by humans — for the first time in history. At this pace, AI will surpass the entire 500-year archive of human-written text before 2030. And it's already reshaping Telegram. Channels are quietly replacing human editors with automated tools — and one of the most interesting examples is @morty, built by the @ma…
She wanted to shoot a lovely video for Instagram, but got a spinal injury.
Posted without readable text
Feels like India rewards fools who have died in the dumbest way possible.
Evidently, it is dangerous to go out in a thunderstorm with a wet umbrella in an open area⚡
Darwin Prize Candidates Party.
The choice of entertainment should be treated with utmost care.
Internet challenges are surpassing themselves with each passing day.
Another failed dive.
When even the chandelier didn't appreciate your dancing
The fun on the playground turned out tragically.
Perhaps, the conception of this video was different.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @darwin_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Darwin Awards” (@darwin_tg), 9,490 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darwin_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.