Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

16+ adapter PROFICTION DARK ASK (proship comship darkship procomship prodarkship comdarkship procomdarkship лоооол)

@darkprofictionalask

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003844898793
TypeChannel
Username@darkprofictionalask
DescriptionМЫ НИЧЕГО НЕ ПРОПАГАНДИРУЕМ И НЕ НЕСЁМ ЦЕЛИ НОРМАЛИЗАЦИИ АМОРАЛЬНЫХ И НЕЗАКОННЫХ ВЕЩЕЙ В ОБЩЕСТВЕ Антис дни Проконтакт педофилы дни Дни
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/darkprofictionalask

Growth

1308 Aug 2026, 06:30 — 130 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 130 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:309 Aug 2026, 01:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:01130no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:30130first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
335.1%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
436
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total4,792
Reactions total99
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Videos
1
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4533.6%
❤‍🔥3123.1%
🤯118.21%
🥰118.21%
👀85.97%
🔥53.73%
😢53.73%
😱42.99%
🏆32.24%
🌚21.49%
👍21.49%
💋21.49%
💘21.49%
👎10.746%
🕊10.746%
🤔10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC174 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Блять это уебище ещё повторно заявку кидает

🤯11😱4🕊1

30 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC193 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кто там эти посты переслал 🫩

❤‍🔥5💘1🤔1

30 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC200 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы против радквиросни пожалуйста забудьте про существование этого канала УЙДИТЕ И ЖЕЛАТЕЛЬНО ЗАПИШИТЕСЬ К ПСИХИАТРУ

10❤‍🔥3💘1

30 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чел, которые кинули заявку аск, имея противников про-контакт пдф в дни, ИДИ НАХУЙ БЛ

❤‍🔥8

20 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC544 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👀8🌚2👍2💋2🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC642 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩸.. 🔠🔠🅱️🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 переходника ⚫Рт пост ⚫Вп пост ⚫Правила и ДНИ ⚫Ссылка на аск ⚫Опрос (проголосуйте пожалуйста) ⚫Список ролей

🥰7

18 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC581 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

[🐛] — ну ряльно ну пж

7🥰4

18 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTC533 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вижу тут некоторые подписываются на переходник, но не кидают заявку в сам аск Ссылка на аск в этом сообщении!

5

16 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC625 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как вы нашли этот аск?

  1. Вп с кф52%
  2. Вп с аском6%
  3. В тгк отвечающего10%
  4. Посоветовал друг/знакомый1%
  5. Пригласили в качестве отвича2%
  6. Вк4%
  7. В подслушке/кф асков7%
  8. В ТикТок0%
  9. Через поиск3%
  10. Свой вариант какой-то в коммах14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

16 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC553 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

★ Список Ролей ★ ★ Персонажи 🌟Жуткий месяц #ЖуткийМесяц — ОС 🙂Захватчик Зим #ЗахватчикЗим — ОС ❤️Undertale #Undertale — АУ!Азриэль #Азриэль ★ Пейринги 🌟Жуткий месяц #ЖуткийМесяц — ОС/ОС 🌹Магическая Битва #МагическаяБитва — Зенин Наоя/ОС #Наоя 🎪Удивительный Цифровой Цирк #УЦЦ — Яндере!Генгл и Зубл в ау японской школы - Абстрагеди #Абстрагеди ☠️Dying Light #DyingLight — Эйден Колдуэлл и Хакон - Хэйден #Хэйден

❤‍🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @darkprofictionalask. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

Как вы нашли этот аск?

  1. Вп с кф52%
  2. Вп с аском6%
  3. В тгк отвечающего10%
  4. Посоветовал друг/знакомый1%
  5. Пригласили в качестве отвича2%
  6. Вк4%
  7. В подслушке/кф асков7%
  8. В ТикТок0%
  9. Через поиск3%
  10. Свой вариант какой-то в коммах14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,012 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“16+ adapter PROFICTION DARK ASK (proship comship darkship procomship prodarkship comdarkship procomdarkship лоооол)” (@darkprofictionalask), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darkprofictionalask.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.