Channel
@darklingveks
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
287subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001974950179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darklingveks |
| Description | Owner - @mandarinblack Owner 2 - @Angelina_aaaaaaaaaa (ะฟะพ ะฒัะตะผ ะฒะพะฟัะพัะพะผ ะบ ะฝะตะน) price - https://t.me/darklingveksprice Info - @darklinginfo(ะฝะต ัะธัะฐะปะธ ะฝะต ะฟะธัะธัะต) folder - https://t.me/foldervalerixscenes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darklingveks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 287 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 287 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 28 September 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
175 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 69 | 39.4% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 22 | 12.6% | |
| ๐ | 20 | 11.4% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 7.43% | |
| ๐คฉ | 11 | 6.29% | |
| ๐ | 10 | 5.71% | |
| ๐พ | 8 | 4.57% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 2.86% | |
| ๐คฏ | 4 | 2.29% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 1.71% | |
| ๐ฅ | 3 | 1.71% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 1.14% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 2 | 1.14% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.571% | |
| ๐ฑ | 1 | 0.571% | |
| ๐ฆ | 1 | 0.571% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 3 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ข๐ท๐ข๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ด : Jenna Ortega ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #JennaOrtega #avatars ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
๐10๐คฉ3โค2๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐พ1๐1๐1
๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด : Anya Taylor-Joy ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #AnyaTaylorJoy #stickers ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค9๐3โคโ๐ฅ2๐2๐1๐พ1๐ฅ1๐คฉ1
๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด : Olivia Rodrigo ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #OliviaRodrigo #stickers ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค3๐2๐2๐คฉ2๐คฏ2๐ฅฐ2โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅ1
ะกะดะตะปะฐะตะผ 2 ััะดะฐ ัะตะฐะบัะธะน?
๐ข๐ท๐ข๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ด : Rapunzel ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #Rapunzel #avatars ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค8โคโ๐ฅ6๐2๐2๐ณ2๐2๐พ1๐1
โ๏ธะ ะตะฑััะฐ, ะพัะตะฝั ะฝัะถะฝั ะฐะดะผะธะฝั, ะบัะพ ั ะพัะตั ะฟะธัะธัะต @Angelina_aaaaaaaaaa โ๏ธ
๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ช๐ถ๐ฎ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ช : Natasha Romanoff ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #NatashaRomanoff #PremiumEmoji ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โคโ๐ฅ11โค5๐3๐3๐พ1๐1๐คฉ1
๐ข๐ท๐ข๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ด : Drew Starkey ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #DrewStarkey #avatars ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค10โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1๐1๐1
๐ข๐ท๐ข๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ด : Sadie Sink ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #SadieSink #avatars ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค6๐2๐1
๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด : JJ Maybank ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #JJMaybank #stickers ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค22๐3๐คฉ3
๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ช : Drew Starkey ๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ฉ๐ต๐ข๐จ : #DrewStarkey #remini ๐๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ญ๐ด ๐ช๐ฏ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฎ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ
โค4๐พ4๐1๐1๐คฉ1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @darklingveks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,006,286 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ฆโ (@darklingveks), 287 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darklingveks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.