Channel
@darin_labs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003109737835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darin_labs |
| Description | Anon ≠ fake. Anon = freedom Dev $KITA & GASHY & $FUNDAQ And More! -$KITA @Kitapowers -GASHY @Gashygangs -FUNDAQ @fundaqcoin |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 23 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darin_labs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 60 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
I want to share a quick update with everyone. Over the past year, I’ve spent most of my time building the foundations of our ecosystem. We’ve launched products like KITA Wallet, KITA Gate, FUNDAQ, and GASHY Bazaar, and there’s still much more to come. Moving forward, I’m changing how I spend my time. Instead of focusing on daily market discussions and chart watching, I’ll be concentrating on engineering, infrastru…
Big update for the $GASHY ecosystem 🚨 Gashy Bazaar is opening soon — and for now, it’s invite only. This is not just a marketplace launch. This is the beginning of building a real commerce ecosystem around $GASHY. What’s the plan? Gashy Official Store will be the first seller It will launch with hundreds of products @AlienKITA will also have its own official store More selected sellers will be added step by step …
We warned you before… and it happened.! Rugs. Dumps. Dead charts. Now this is your last warning. Based on deep research and real market patterns — some of the biggest “CTO” tokens are about to get hit hard. Insiders are preparing exits. Liquidity is thinner than it looks. And once it starts… there’s no way out. Most people will realize too late — again. Don’t be exit liquidity. Bookmark this. Stay sharp. Stay SAF…
We told you before. Not every “A**DAQ” coin is real. Not every hype is safe. You said we were wrong. You said we were jealous. You thought we were competing. We were just… early. Now everything is clear. We don’t guess — we see. We don’t follow — we build. Our expectations? 99.99%. $FUNDAQ will shine. $FUNDAQ will stay. $FUNDAQ is built to last.
Goodbye to outdated systems. @phantom @solflare_wallet @Backpack @solana @solana_devs They served their purpose. Now we build what comes next. $KITA Wallet — Next Gen Wallet System. Not just a wallet. An infrastructure layer. Solana is the start. Other chains are closer than you think. @AlienKITA
Let me make this clear — as the founder behind this ecosystem. We are seeing an increase in: Fake accounts Fake Telegram groups Fake OTC offers Fake airdrops Fake “team members” This only happens when something starts getting attention. But understand this: We will NEVER DM you first. We will NEVER ask you for money. We will NEVER offer private deals. We will NEVER ask you to connect your wallet through random li…
$100 GIVEAWAY — $KITA / $GASHY / $FUNDAQ This is not for everyone. We’re rewarding people who actually understand what’s being built here. Breakdown: • $KITA → $50 (3 winners) • $GASHY → $30 (3 winners) • $FUNDAQ → $20 (2 winner) To enter: 1. Comment which ecosystem will dominate — and WHY 2. Repost 3. Follow @AlienKITA @Gashycoin @Fundaqio 4. Tag 3 people — let’s see their perspective Bonus: Reply to others. C…
Most people see red candles and panic. We see opportunity. Every time fear hits the market, we step in and buy. Not for hype — for control. Control of supply. Control of direction. Weak hands create volatility. Strong hands build the floor. Most projects wait for momentum. We create it. Most teams react. We execute. Most disappear under pressure. We buy under pressure. Buybacks will continue — not because we…
🚨 The countdown has started. What we’ve been building in the shadows is finally getting close. The Neon Cat is about to change the game. New systems. New energy. New level. If you know… you know. ⏳ Tick… tock… #GASHY #Solana
I’m building $KITA, GASHY, and FUNDAQ with a mindset most people in crypto never develop. We are not building pump toys. We are not building hype loops. We are not here for charts, candles, or exit liquidity. We are building things people will NEED, not just things they want to trade. If price goes to zero tomorrow — we don’t stop. Because belief doesn’t come from charts, it comes from what’s being built behind th…
Being an Honest Dev in Memecoins: Why It’s the Hardest Job in Crypto In crypto, especially in memecoins, honesty is not rewarded immediately. In fact, it’s often punished. I want to write this not as a defense, not as a reaction to volatility, but as an explanation — from someone who has spent years coding, building, deploying contracts, managing liquidity, studying market behavior, and choosing to stay visible when…
Community Update We want to address the recent price movement clearly and transparently. There was no rug, no liquidity removal, and no team sell. Liquidity remains intact, contracts unchanged, and the chain is fully public. The recent drop was caused by external sell pressure from a non-team wallet, which is visible on-chain and verifiable by anyone. Volatility happens in open markets. Transparency is how strong…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @darin_labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 815,501 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DarinLabs” (@darin_labs), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darin_labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.