Channel
@daria_all_the_way
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
220subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001550241540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daria_all_the_way |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daria_all_the_way |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 220 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 224 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 221 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 214 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 209 | +19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 190 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 190 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 47.3% | |
| custom 5447363169624276511 | 12 | 21.8% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5341601592825098333 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.64% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не превратиться в отца своего = повзрослеть? Почему в «Одиссее» Нолана Телемах (сын Одиссея) показан нам именно таким и что это говорит об исцелении детско-родительской травмы? Разбираем в коротких карточках (и да, хайпуем пока можем)🛡
custom 54473631696242765117✍3👀2
10 признаков, что в тебе проявлена #Афина 🛡️ Пока мир смотрит на Зендаю в образе Афины в «Одиссее», я предлагаю посмотреть на Афину внутри себя 🧿 У каждой женщины есть несколько ведущих архетипов — обычно 1, 2 или 3. Ещё есть теневые архетипы: те, которые подавлены, не проявлены, но именно через них мы часто и идём путём развития. Сейчас лично меня интересует именно богиня Афина, поэтому давайте посмотрим на каче…
👏4❤🔥2✍1custom 54473631696242765111
Пассивно-агрессивная я всё сказала 🤘 Если коротко и текстом — я сделала методичку по типажам мужчин, с которыми ТОЧНО не получится счастливых отношений. И дарю ее всем желающим бесплатно 🆓 Почему ты их встречаешь и что ещё нудно проработать, чтобы перестать на них вестись. В инстаграме уже разбирают. Отрываю от сердца — все прожито (если не мной, то подругами и клиентками). Оставляй любой комментарий, если хочеш…
custom 54473631696242765113✍1
За Елену и двор стреляю в упор 🗡 Пока все смотрят «Одиссею» (а я терпеливо жду свой сеанс в Imax на другом конце города, потому что Паша отказывается смотреть иначе), давайте раз и навсегда разберёмся: Какие боги были на чьей стороне и почему? Троянская война — не просто история о том, как боги разделились на две команды, а символическое распределение архетипических сил. И тут мой специальный интерес вступает в иг…
❤🔥10✍1👏1
Прошла классный тест у Даши! Мой ведущий архетип - Артемида. А я думала сова Афина. Переобулась в воздухе ) Второе место делят совсем разные Афродиточка и Лилит. Богини, отвечающие за домашний очаг, типа Гестии, такие с нулем баллов: 🗿🗿🗿
❤🔥5
Внезапно ожил мой первый тест на архетипы богинь! 🧜♀️ Я близка к разработке нового более глубокого теста на определение базовых архетипов женщины, но уже сейчас вы можете попросить меня прислать первую версию теста 🍎 Пишите о своём желании в комментариях (это бесплатно).
❤🔥6custom 54473631696242765111
Daria all the Way ♾️ pinned a photo
Почему таро? И терапия тоже Я много лет являюсь большим адептом психотерапии. Сама ходила и хожу, исследую разные подходы, проверяю инструменты на себе и понимаю, как сильно может менять жизнь качественная психологическая работа. Но никогда мне не приходило в голову относиться скептически или свысока к таро. И никогда я не назову этот процесс «заменой терапии». Это другое. Иное — если хотите. Во всех смыслах. Тар…
❤🔥3✍2custom 53416015928250983332
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @daria_all_the_way. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daria all the Way ♾️” (@daria_all_the_way), 220 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daria_all_the_way.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.