Channel
@darchallenges
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002173037011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darchallenges |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darchallenges |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 26 | +4 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 22 | no change |
| 7 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 22 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (5 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 671 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Karl Hofer نقاش اکسپرسیونیست آلمانی. مانند بسیاری از دیگر هنرمندان آلمانی به قدرت رسیدن هیتلر برای او نیز دردسرهای بزرگی را به همراه آورد. هوفر حتا از کسانی بود که پیش از به قدرت رسیدن هیتلر علیه حزب او موضع‌گیری کرده بود و وقتی ناسیونال‌سوسیالیسم به رهبری هیتلر در سال 1933 به قدرت رسید آیندۀ کاری کارل هوفر نیز بسیار دشوار شد. با سقوط هیتلر و رایش سوم، کارل هوفر به بالاترین سطح هنری آلمان بازگشت و رئیس دانشگاه هنر ب…
او در نیمۀ اول قرن بیستم آلمان به یکی از برجسته‌ترین نقاشان اکسپرسیونیسم آلمان تبدیل شد و در سال‌هایی که جریان هنریِ «عینیت نو» در آلمان بسیار پا گرفته بود او جایگاه اکسپرسیونیستی خود را حفظ کرد. پس از جنگ جهانی دوم که هنر انتزاعی در آلمان روزبه‌روز مقبولیت بیش‌تری می‌یافت، او از سرسخت‌ترین مخالفان هنر انتزاعی بود. حتی کتابی به منزلۀ «مانیفست ضدآبستره» می‌نوشت تا به کاندینسکی، نظریه‌پرداز اصلی هنر آبستره، پاسخی کامل …
❤1
زنگ تاریخ هنر☝️🤓
💋3
Anselm Kiefer نقاش، مجسمه‌ساز و هنرمند چیدمان. آنسلم کیفر از مهم‌ترین هنرمندان آلمان پس از جنگ جهانی دوم و از چهره‌های تأثیرگذار هنر معاصر است. آثار او اغلب با ویرانی، جنگ، مرگ و تاریخ آلمان در ارتباط‌اند. کیفر به‌جای فراموش گذشته به سراغ تاریک‌ترین بخش‌های تاریخ آلمان می‌رود و آن را به موضوع اصلی آثارش تبدیل می‌کند. در آثار او خرابه و ویرانی ساختمان ها انبوه قابل مشاهده‌ست. این مواد فقط عناصر بصری نیستند و هرکدام حا…
Ken Currie نقاش کن کری نقاش اسکاتلندی و از چهره‌های مهم نسل «پسران جدید گلاسگو» است. آثار او بیشتر بر بدن انسان، مرگ، خشونت، بیماری، رنج و اضطراب اجتماعی متمرکزند. فیگورهای او اغلب حالتی میان واقعیت، کابوس و رؤیا دارند. کری از بدن انسان برای نشان دادن شکنندگی استفاده می‌کند؛ پیکره‌های آسیب‌دیده و گاه متلاشی‌شده در آثارش واکنشی به خشونت، فقر و بحران‌های انسانی هستند. کری درباره‌ی هدفش از نقاشی می‌گوید: ««می‌خواهم بینن…
💘2
Wiesław Wałkuski طراح گرافیک لهستانی در کارهای او نیم تنه هایی از موجوداتی شبیه به انسان می بینیم. با چشمانی بسته، یا زل زده به نقطه ای خارج از قاب؛ پوشیده در جامه هایی مندرس، با عضلاتی کشیده و پیچ خورده به دور بدن. به نظر می رسد این انسانها در ابدیت رنج آوری فرو رفته اند؛ انگار همگی منجمد در زمان، با یک چشم باز و یک چشم بسته کابوسی بی انتها را نظاره گرند. در جهان ویسلاو واکوسکی، ما غریبه ای مزاحمیم که با شگفتی به ا…
Kaethe kollwitz آثار او اعتراض و فریاد بر علیه جهنم ساخته بشر و شکنجه و عذاب فراگیر در آلمان است که سرانجام وحشی‌ترین دوران‌های عصر جدید را در تاریخ پدید آورد. او بزودی نقاشی را کنار نهاد و احساس نمود که در رنگ فاقد حسی قوی ست و توانایی کار با رنگ روغن را ندارد. آثار او به این دو موضوع محدود میشود :پیکرهای زمخت، بچه‌ها ی گرسنه درشت چشم. در آثار او فقر،گرسنگی، شکست، استثمار،بی عدالتی، ظلم انسان به انسان دیده میشود و …
James ensor نقاش وگراورساز بلژیکی وی به عنوان یکی از پیشگامان اکسپرسیونیسم شناخته می شود ؛ اگرچه هنر نمادین وراز پردازانه اش به سورئالیسم نیز نزدیکی دارد. انسور، در شهر ساحلی اوستنده به دنیا آمد. پدرش انگلیسی و مادرش فلاندری بود. انسور در بسیاری از نقاشی‌های خود از اسکلت‌ها و صورتکهایی کریه و وهم‌انگیز استفاده می‌کرد. علاقهٔ او به استفاده از ماسک‌ها احتمالاً ریشه در فروشگاه مادرش دارد که پر از نقاب‌های عجیب و ترسناک…
💘1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @darchallenges. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چالش دار” (@darchallenges), 26 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darchallenges.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.