╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * pure vanilla cookie лежит кайфует ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #crk #арт
custom 590015548401018968413🔥5custom 58998294401578487464🍓1👍1💘1

Channel
@dararara1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
156subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002421448441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dararara1 |
| Description | рисую 🙏 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dararara1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 156 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 156 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 157 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
580 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 192 | 33.1% | |
| 💘 | 93 | 16.0% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5900155484010189684 | 65 | 11.2% | |
| 🍓 | 44 | 7.59% | |
| custom 5899829440157848746 | 32 | 5.52% | |
| 💋 | 25 | 4.31% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 2.41% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 2.41% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 2.07% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 1.21% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.862% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.517% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.172% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.172% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.172% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * pure vanilla cookie лежит кайфует ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #crk #арт
custom 590015548401018968413🔥5custom 58998294401578487464🍓1👍1💘1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒘 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒌 𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒊𝒆 я хз, не понимаю заложила ли я смысл а эту картинку или нет. но хорошо же когда глазу пиздато, поэтому нормально 😋 ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #crk #арт
custom 590015548401018968413custom 58998294401578487465🔥4🍓1💋1💘1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * ฅ^•ﻌ•^ฅ почему фембой даня кашин обнимает какого-то длинноволосого деда?... ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #осята #арт
custom 590015548401018968410custom 58998294401578487464👍3❤1🍓1💘1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * EAT IT UUUUUP ФУУУ ЭТО ШЕДОУВАНИЛЫЫЫ🤢🤢🤢 они уже воняют ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #шедоуванилы #арт
🍓14custom 59001554840101896848custom 58998294401578487466💘3🤡1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * 𝑻𝒊𝒍𝒍 провела ассоции что он напоминает мне ель, теперь он буквально рождественская ёлка 🎄 ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #алнст #арт
custom 590015548401018968412custom 58998294401578487466❤2🍓2🔥2💋1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * внезапно..... ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #forsaken
❤9custom 58998294401578487464custom 59001554840101896842🐳1💋1💘1🔥1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 ⊹ ܀ * ٭ඩා ˙• * fem!!! pure vanilla cookie пятки ей не нарисовала потому что съела их 🤷♀ ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #арт #crk
❤10💘4custom 58998294401578487463🥰2🐳1👀1💋1🔥1
╭─────╌╌┄┄┈┈▸ ︴⏤⦅𐌽𐌴𐍪 ᖘ𐌏𐍃𐍄 *🎐 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙨𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙬 первый арт за этот год! ˙₊∘✦━╾──────╼━✦∘₊˙ #арт #алнст
❤12💘8🔥8👀2🙏1custom 59001554840101896841
ну вот они, результаты почти за год. я довольна тем как мой скилл вырос с начала ведения канала до сегодняшнего дня. возможно за это время я так и не поняла что хочу от своего творчества, но я рада, что я не стою на месте. всё двигаюсь и двигаюсь потихонькуууу. вообщем я умничка ;) #щп
❤10💘4🔥4🍓3👀1custom 59001554840101896841
с Новым годом! ^^ всех с наступающим праздником!!! надеюсь новый год подарит вам много положительных эмоций и счастливых моментов ❤️ #арт #crk #шедоуванилы
❤13💘6🥰2⚡1custom 59001554840101896841
красавица есть на аккаунте, значит и должна быть в тгк 😼😼😼 я, блять, не могу уже. у меня ибис полетел, интернет не работает и я буквально передавала этот арт с планшета по блютузу😭😭😭 я будто в 2008 нахуй #crk #скетч
❤10💘8🐳2👀1💋1custom 59001554840101896841
эта зима на редкость холодная у меня нет новогоднего настроения 🤷♀️ ещё я не люблю принимать и дарить подарки обычно, поэтому вообще не вайб. хочется уже весну #арт #crk
❤13💘10🔥5🎉1🐳1👍1💋1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dararara1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 911,599 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ⲇⲁrⲁ-rⲁ-rⲁ | 🎐” (@dararara1), 156 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dararara1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.