Channel

NFT @daoqun 导群道群

@daoqun1

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003031162865
Type	Channel
Usernames	@daoqun @daoqun1
Description	更多用户名 @tg8tg 41#
Created	25 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	12 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/daoqun1

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:45	84	no change
12 Aug 2026, 01:32	84	first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 2
Links: 2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 141,473 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 62 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

@qunshi 群狮
@qunshi1 · 32 posts NFT @qunsong 群松
@qunsong · 32 posts @xuanqun 炫群选群
@xuanqunbot · 12 posts @yoqun yo群
@yoqunbot · 22 posts NFT @baibo 白波百博(赌博)
@baiboqun · 291 post NFT @danqian 单签
@danqian · 21 post NFT @desou 的搜
@desou8 · 21 post 干将(出货频道)
@ganjiangmy · 101 post NFT @goushou 狗首勾手
@goushuou1 · 21 post NFT @jianliao 简聊
@jianliao_bot · 21 post NFT @kuoshen 阔神
@kuoshenbot · 141 post NFT @niulin 牛林
@niulin · 21 post NFT @qiangduan 抢断强端
@qiangduan1 · 21 post 挑美频道
@qiankou1 · 101 post naiqiu奶球saonai骚奶
@qiaosao · 121 post NFT @sansou 三搜
@sansou3 · 21 post NFT @shensong 神松神颂
@shensong · 21 post 刷贴带贴飞机微信用户名
@shuatiebot · 61 post NFT @souqie 搜切
@souqiebot · 21 post NFT @souqing 搜睛搜情
@souqingbot · 21 post NFT @soutuo 搜拓
@soutuobot · 31 post 索达id全拼@suoda出售。老频道带贴+用户名+微信ws+飞机号代开会员
@suoda · 41 post @xipan 西盘(西港大盘)
@xigangdapan · 31 post NFT @yueniu 约妞约牛
@yueniu · 21 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

@chuangqun 创群
@chuangqun1 · 22 posts @louqun 楼群
@louqun · 22 posts 土豆担保公群 @tddbqun
@tddbqun · 102 posts NFT @duoniu 多牛多妞
@duoniu_bot · 21 post NFT @goushou 狗首勾手
@goushuou1 · 21 post NFT @guishou 鬼首
@guishou1 · 31 post @haixu 海需(海外供需)
@haiwaigongxu1 · 31 post 华售华首画首
@huashou8 · 21 post NFT @mianshen 缅神免审
@mianshen1 · 21 post NFT @niumai 牛卖牛迈
@niumai1 · 21 post NFT @niuqian 牛签(多签签名)
@niuqian · 21 post @niuqiang 牛强牛枪
@niuqiang8 · 21 post NFT @niuquan 牛圈(牛逼圈)
@niuquan1 · 21 post NFT @niuyong 牛勇
@niuyong8 · 21 post NFT @niuzhou 牛州
@niuzhou1 · 21 post @niuzhun 牛准
@niuzhunbot · 21 post o签+o风(有钱又顺丰)o钱
@oqian · 31 post @souguan 搜官
@souguanbot · 21 post 骚名用户名NFT任选🆔
@tg8tg · 2951 post NFT @weituo 委托
@weituo8 · 41 post @xipan 西盘(西港大盘)
@xigangdapan · 31 post @xishou 西首喜售
@xishou1 · 21 post NFT @youxing 游行有型
@youxing6 · 21 post NFT @yueniu 约妞约牛
@yueniu · 21 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 1; vacant every time we have ever looked

@daoqun1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@sounv
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT @daoqun 导群道群” (@daoqun1), 84 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daoqun1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

NFT @daoqun 导群 道群