Ну просто прекрасный же

Channel
Сонный паралич в недоумении
@danochy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
176subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001226498891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danochy |
| Description | Привет, я Даночи. Делюсь тут своими мыслями и публикую контент 💛 https://boosty.to/danochy – мой Бусти 🪙 https://m.twitch.tv/danochynight — мой Твич 👾 youtube.com/@da-nochy – мой Ютубчик 👀 https://vk.com/da_nochy – группа в ВК 💩 |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danochy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 176 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 176 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.9%
- avg views ÷ 176 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 71.9
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 23.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 935 |
| Reactions total | 207 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,240
- Videos
- ≈176
- Links
- ≈125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 29s
- Average length
- 2m 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
207 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377669452571616896 | 46 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5264921780753043651 | 30 | 14.5% | |
| 🐳 | 30 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5456521517368096904 | 29 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5265180123035896129 | 27 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5332742784690435345 | 25 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5332306978653880721 | 19 | 9.18% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.483% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🌟🌟🌟 А ну-ка, dears, поактивничаем! Что это за огонь 🔥 фоточки с московского EpicCon! Кто-то разлёгся отдохнуть 😊 Благодарю за бесподобные кадры! 📷 Владислав Синицын #epiccon #fest #cosplay #alastor #hazbinhotel
custom 537766945257161689610
Нуро, кстати, один из моих любимых художников, очень жду от неё мерч 😌 Подпишитесь!
custom 54565215173680969046custom 52649217807530436513custom 53327427846904353452
Косплей по арту или арт по косплею? А вообще, просто оцените, какую красоту рисует Нуро 🩵
custom 53776694525716168967custom 53323069786538807212custom 52649217807530436511
୨୧➿➿➿nᧉ⍵❤️թꪮ᥉t➿➿➿୨୧ 🌟🥺𝐁𝐄𝐀𝐂𝐇 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄🥺🌟 лето еще не закончилось, а значит я успела нарисовать что-то летнее и о боги это статики! ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ по секрету, арт вдохновлен этими хорошиками⬇️ Вокс😎 Ал😝 ୨୧➿➿➿nᧉ⍵❤️թꪮ᥉t➿➿➿୨୧
🐳5custom 52649217807530436513custom 53327427846904353452custom 53776694525716168961custom 54565215173680969041
Лично от меня фоточка со сцены) Счастливый побаловался 🥺
custom 53323069786538807219custom 54565215173680969045🐳2custom 52651801230358961291
Смотрим, веселимся и наслаждаемся! 😉 Ещё раз сердечно благодарим Душный канон и Rocket за высокую оценку нашей шалости на сцене и классные спецпризы! 🫶 И чудесную публику, конечно же!
custom 53776694525716168968
А кит что значит?
🐳5custom 53776694525716168961
Вокс просит новый паричок? Да 🦈 Нет 🦈
custom 526518012303589612912🐳8custom 52649217807530436516custom 53323069786538807213
Кхм… сказать, что я в шоке — ничего не сказать ✨
custom 533274278469043534516custom 52651801230358961298custom 52649217807530436517🐳3👾1
Как мы с Киц подаёмся на дефиле: 😀😀😀 🙎♀️Вокс: звук собрал, видос собрал, реквизит, если надо, собрал, заявку заполнил, отправил, после того, как заявку приняли, отписался куратору по его вопросам и задал свои 🤩Аластор: красивый 🥰
custom 526492178075304365110custom 54565215173680969048🐳5custom 53327427846904353453custom 53776694525716168961
Немножко про мэджик 🤩 ❤️ 🤍🤍🤍🤍 ❤️ Будем считать, что это образ вдохновлённый Азирафелем (или Азирафаэлем, кому как больше нравится) из Благих Знамений 🤎 Не могу сказать, что мне прям совсем категорически не идёт, но как будто бы не мой персонаж 😅 Что ж, я лет сто не была на ДКшных фестах 🙂 Мэджик мне в общем и целом понравился. Сначала было скучновато, но потом втянулась 👍 За компанию спасибо: Самой прекрасной эль…
custom 53776694525716168969custom 53323069786538807215custom 54565215173680969044custom 53327427846904353452
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @danochy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 436,812 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сонный паралич в недоумении” (@danochy), 176 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danochy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.