Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Василий Данильчик

@danilchik_live

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003285763100
TypeChannel
Username@danilchik_live
DescriptionЯ — Василий Данильчик, контент-продюсер и амбассадор ИИ Здесь мой лайфстайл-блог. Общаюсь, шучу и обсуждаю: AI, PR, маркетинг, личный бренд, дисциплину, путешествия, заведения, немножко философии и читаю рэп ✌️
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/danilchik_live

Growth

807 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:0280no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3580first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.2%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total365
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
127
Videos
33
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1227.3%
🔥920.5%
😱511.4%
🤔49.09%
👀36.82%
🗿36.82%
24.55%
💅24.55%
custom 521979815426159720912.27%
custom 522242857262229335612.27%
👍12.27%
😁12.27%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC39 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeuroDailyGoPhoto

Я сделал игру. За пару вечеров, разговором с нейросетью — сам не написал ни строчки кода. «Тропа клиента» — тавер-дефенс про продажи. По кварталу едут предприниматели, которые о вас не слышали. Вдоль дороги вы открываете офисы, каждый даёт клиенту касание. Убедили до конца пути — покупает. Не успели — уехал ни с чем. 100 волн. Каждая 5-я — корпорации, каждая 10-я — холдинги. Денег мало: важно не засыпать карту офис

🔥41👍1💅1

27 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ходил тут ко врачу и узнал почему антибиотики можно купить только по рецепту Дак вот. Она рассказывает: люди покупают антибиотики, пьют 2 дня, им становится лучше и они прекращают их принимать. А так делать нельзя! Потому что организм привыкает и перестает их нормально переносить. Крч они перестают работать. То есть в следующий раз они просто могут не подействовать на организм. Поэтому надо пить сколько врач пропис

21🤔1

18 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026

Мой хороший друг собирает поход в горы)

18 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC70 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tickettotenderVideo

⛰ «А что за поход-то?» — рассказываю. Привет, друзья! После вчерашнего поста про поход в личку прилетело несколько вопросов: что за формат, кто едет, что там будет? Отвечаю всем сразу. Но сначала — почему я вообще считаю, что ехать надо именно сейчас. Время непростое, чего уж там. Ставки, урезанные бюджеты, заказчики переписывают планы на ходу. И в такие периоды многие совершают одну и ту же ошибку — вцепляются в раб

🔥41

15 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😱2👀1🗿1🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👀1🗿1🤔1😱1

13 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Посмотрите интересный ролик на эту тему от топовой американской ИИ-компанией Anthropic, создателей Claude. Он небольшой — 5 минут. Включите автодубляж. Он про разные уровни мышления Claude. Разработчики заявляют, что у модели есть внутренние мысли. И рассказывают как они это выяснили. А кульминация про то, как Claude не мог сделать задачу, ввел неверные данные, а внутри в это время думал о манипуляции. Такие дела.

1

9 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC48 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeuroDailyGo

Смотреть трансляцию https://youtube.com/live/9SDDW33HCv8 https://youtube.com/live/9SDDW33HCv8 https://youtube.com/live/9SDDW33HCv8 https://youtube.com/live/9SDDW33HCv8

9 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeuroDailyGoPhoto

Твое лицо теперь может сгенерировать кто угодно Механика простая и от этого неприятная: любой пользователь Instagram* может в промте написать твой ник через «@» — и система подтянет твои публичные фото как референс для генерации. Без запроса, без уведомления тебе. Работает даже с людьми, на которых ты не подписан. Если аккаунт открытый — ты в этом по умолчанию. Тумблер уже включён, никто тебя не спрашивал. Треш. Есл

🗿1🤔1😱1

7 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Слышали новость!? Мы снова сможем участвовать в Олимпийских играх! УРА! 🤩🥳 Следующие Олимпийские игры пройдут в Лос-Анджелесе (США) — это летние Игры 2028 года.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @danilchik_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Василий Данильчик” (@danilchik_live), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danilchik_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.