2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 18:32
81
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:29
81
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
22
46.8%
👍
14
29.8%
🔥
7
14.9%
😁
2
4.26%
🤡
2
4.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2022 to 21 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(SOL) PepeRun
New launch. Dev looks like he’s out of tokens and good bottom here. Good branding and ticker. Has working game. find safe entries. dyor
https://t.me/peperunonsol <— NEW COMMUNITY TG
https://peperun.live/
https://dexscreener.com/solana/7KkfxrcMCL3vqEWDjNMzbocxoxbSW6hSMG4i3ChWsBDX
1LONG
Watching this and buying some lets see. NFA
https://t.me/ILONGToken
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x3ea535758B9e728a303e0CC7fEcb91E505De5ABB
5/5 tax
Aping Baby busd here. Nice solid floor before the night ends for me. Got pushed to nearly 10k after bottoming out yesterday until jeets took over again. Rewards are just too nice to ignore. Dev and team willing to push if community backs it. Join the TG for more info!
🌟 Tokenomics
🔸 Total Supply: 1,000,000
🔸 10% BUSD Rewards
💎All taxes for holders, providing a 10% BUSD rewards💎
Telegram : https://t.me/BabyBUSDBEP2
Check this At $17k MCAP holding a bag with more chads and whales 🐳incoming DYOR
Marketing incoming from dev team🛡️
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x59fded31a18fca9527c44087e32bc0a46ceffe38
https://t.me/TheCageETH
Just launched, new team to me but smooth stealth launch and dev seems based. Name is real nice, could see this doing numbers 🔥
http://t.me/TheTrippyGPT
https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x7eA58830Fac40379687A1B9a7D629bA4f7f49Fd8?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=bobbybuybot
https://t.me/safemoonmodern
900$ mcap
Jeets out and dev made some buy back, I see a lot of based chads in, im calling this cause seems a good gamble gem,dyor,first time with this dev.
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xa62976e2cfe7d5d43156710ab44e7393c5243cac
Doge Based Ai
Nice name and i saw some good name in chat...more marketing will come after us...degen for now so ape wisely
16k
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xa8d26ec42381f9c0334b99cc68ebf7bc78b8f5b7
https://t.me/DogeBasedAIOfficial
NFA/DYOR
🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daniellesafucalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
6
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
6
vacant every time we have ever looked
@daniellesafucalls named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@azariumnetwork named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@peperunonsol named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@safemoonmodern named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@shaohuiinu named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@thecageeth named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@thetrippygpt named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DanielleSafuCalls” (@daniellesafucalls), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daniellesafucalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.