Danger Mouse Crypto pinned a photo

Channel
Danger Mouse Crypto
@dangermousecalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001599853484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dangermousecalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dangermousecalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 36 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 35 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Think it’s happening, big movement, could this be L day? https://t.me/loopnetwork/1
Danger Mouse Crypto pinned a photo
Perfect timing, x2 already
Photo, posted without a caption
Andy Buy! 🛴🛴🛴 💵 0.116 BNB ($61.86) 🪙 208,684 ANDY 🔶 0x5882…9bee | Txn 🔼 Position +6.29% 🔼 Market Cap $2,958,176 🥇 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔸 Trending
Danger Mouse Crypto pinned a photo
Seems to be in accumulating phase, around x15 from Ath 🎲 🎲 🎲 roll em
Photo, posted without a caption
I think BSC will make a comeback soon, surely it will you know how deep CZ pockets are. IMO this is definitely one to watch, very nice chart and seems to be very well funded. http://t.me/andycoinbsc
Andy Buy! 🛴🛴 💵 0.10 BNB ($53.71) 🪙 317,106 ANDY 🔶 0xbf50…1aa3 | Txn 🔼 Position +10.04% 🔼 Market Cap $1,690,283 🥇 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔸 Trending
4 days until airdrop applications go out for this. Imagine getting in the #1 meme on a chain for FREE. 2,000 people will. The announcement will be here, for the project and airdrop applications: https://t.me/+NXpOYtF7NRQ1NDg0 20 of you who forward this message to a community / group and provide proof to my admin @Trav_admin will be selected to receive the airdrop. Remember, if this should hit 100M, the value of y…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dangermousecalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dangermousecalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Danger Mouse Crypto” (@dangermousecalls), 36 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dangermousecalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.