Posted without readable text
custom 53485294137282564813custom 53480704363431342242

Channel
@dandesignerr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
106subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002149537805 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dandesignerr |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dandesignerr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 106 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:11 | 107 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (27 August 2025 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 33 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
117 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 41 | 35.0% | |
| custom 5348529413728256481 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5449468596952507859 | 14 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5348070436343134224 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5372886001465170842 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5197209727251004682 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5893376775781617954 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5895514131896733546 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5199850294619442986 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5350618807943576963 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5397972596203462916 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| custom 5399888628358855518 | 1 | 0.855% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dandesignerr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 53485294137282564813custom 53480704363431342242
Небольшая подборка моих недавних обложек 🦁 Давно не выкладывал работы, но за это время получилось вырасти по качеству: стал лучше собирать композицию, точнее работать со смыслами и делать карточки визуально сильнее 🔥 Собрал несколько свежих работ - буду рад, если посмотрите) 🌿[Сделать заказ] 🫶 [Отзывы] ✨[Прочее]
custom 53480704363431342247custom 58955141318967335465custom 58933767757816179543custom 53485294137282564811
🎄 С Новым годом, дорогие друзья! Желаю вам творческих и материальных успехов, ярких идей и уверенных шагов вперёд. Пусть в 2026 году осуществятся все цели и планы, которые вы для себя поставили. Счастья, любви и вдохновения в новом году! ✨
🔥10custom 51972097272510046826custom 58933767757816179543
🚀 Я решил прокачать свою проф. компетенцию! Буквально на днях купил обучение у Жени, и это уже дало для меня массу импакта 🔥 Менее, чем за день, прошёл модули по цвету, композиции и другим важным аспектам дизайна, а затем сразу закрепил всё на практике. И что же мне это дало? — стал глубже понимать визуал и как он влияет на восприятие, — добавил в свои работы больше психологии, чтобы дизайн пробивал потолок CTR кли…
🔥16custom 544946859695250785911custom 53485294137282564819
Подготовил для вас полезную информацию ⚡️ Собрал гайд по работе со стеклянными элементами в Фигме — это актуальный и трендовый приём, который может заметно освежить дизайн (главное, не перегружать). По фотошопу подобных гайдов хватает, а вот именно в Фигме их почти нет, поэтому уверен, вам будет полезно 😉 Дайте знать, если захотите увидеть больше подобных постов в моём канале 🔥 [#длядизайна] Danil Romanenko | Диз…
🔥6custom 54494685969525078593custom 53728860014651708422
⚡В этом месяце я прям взялся за дело — сделал рекордное количество карточек и, что удивительно, не выгорел 😝 Больше всего фокус был на клиентах: читаемость, аккуратная типографика, структура. Любимого «визуального кайфа» получилось меньше, чем хотелось бы (да, грустно 🤨) Но и правда, дизайн ради дизайна — не всегда путь. Нужно балансировать: и вкус прокачивать, и клиентские задачи решать. Короче, делюсь результато…
🔥9custom 53506188079435769634custom 53485294137282564812
😐 Если ты тут впервые! [Пост-знакомство] Привет, я Данил Я дизайнер инфографики и студент 2 курса менеджмента 🔥 Чем могу быть полезен? — Инфографика для маркетплейсов — Оформление всех соцсетей — Оформление сообществ ВК — Рекламные баннеры, креативы и сторисы — Презентации — Превью обложки — Полиграфия 📌Навигация: — Работы и кейсы [Pinterest] — Полезные материалы [#длядизайна] — Информационный канал с прайсом [Inf…
custom 53728860014651708425custom 51998502946194429864custom 53485294137282564814custom 53979725962034629161custom 53998886283588555181
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dandesignerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,210,933 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘿𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙡 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙠𝙤 | Графический дизайнер” (@dandesignerr), 106 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dandesignerr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.