Channel name was changed to «Дэмиан-truшный-Уэйн 18+ [РЕСТ]»

Channel
Дэмиан-truшный-Уэйн 18+ [РЕСТ]
@damiantruerobin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002498470097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @damiantruerobin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2024 and 13 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/damiantruerobin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 79 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 79 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
401 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 175 | 43.6% | |
| 🥰 | 50 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 8.48% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 6.48% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 3.99% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 3.49% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 3.24% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 3.24% | |
| 🥴 | 11 | 2.74% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 2.24% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.25% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 1.25% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.748% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.748% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.748% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Живой. Просто занят расследованием убийств с Дрейком, расследованием пропажи Рэйвен, и... Логаном. Внезапно, да? Для меня тоже внезапно. Я чувствовал, что так просто та история с голубями не закончится. Не знаю что из всего этого выйдет, его терзают сомнения. Он что-то вынюхал и след привёл его в Готэм. >ТТ< #RobinAnon
❤16😭6🥰3👍1
В связи с постом выше я чувствую необходимость прояснить пару моментов. Дорогие-уважаемые, у вас есть полное право любить любой пейринг, который вы хотите. Хоть сову с глобусом шипперите, мне без разницы. Но НЕ НАВЯЗЫВАЙТЕ это другим людям. Особенно, когда вас прямым текстом попросили этого не делать, тем более в такой бестактной манере. Мне искренне непонятно почему есть заблуждение, что если вы продолжите стоять на…
❤20👏10👍7😢3💯2🔥2👎1
... Не стоит мне приказывать, можно крупно пожалеть. Я даже комментировать это не буду. Логан бы мне это не прислал, Кент тем более... Кому-то явно нечем заняться. >ТТ< #RobinAnon
❤10🤨5🫡3🙏3🌚2😭2🤔1
Честно говоря, после всей этой ситуации с голубями он начал как-то странно себя вести. Говорит, что его беспокоят животные, и происходящие с ними вещи, но прямых ответов он так и не даëт. >ТТ< Ни дня спокойствия, теперь ещё и за животными следить.
❤11😁4🔥1
Как вот это должно было повлиять на степень моего негодования в нашей с ним переписке?
❤12
... Я все меньше и меньше понимаю логику Логана, вот честно.
❤11
>ТТ< Я реально должен на это отвечать?... Моя личная жизнь касается меня исключительно. #RobinAnon
❤19👏6
Если кто-нибудь запретит Логану доступ в интернет – скажу спасибо, так уж и быть. Мог бы и сам этим заняться, но время у меня не резиновое, как и терпение. Хотя последнее методично истощается.
🥰10❤5
В Готэме в очередной раз какая-то подозрительная активность, но что я делаю вместо того, чтобы разобраться с этим? Иду с Логаном на какую-то экранизацию одного из его комиксов. Я понятия не имею в чем сюжет и о каких персонажах идет речь, но его нытье действовало на нервы. Этот олух еще и опоздал. А потом решил, что везде слишком жарко и нам жизненно необходимо выпить "слаш". >ТТ< Уже во всю реклама идет, а он думает…
🥰16❤6👏5
Я запрещаю задавать вопросы. >TT<
❤20🔥5🕊2🦄2
От адм: для атмосферы советую включить при прочтении.
❤15🔥9🥰5😢3💔1😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @damiantruerobin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 271,731 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дэмиан-truшный-Уэйн 18+ [РЕСТ]” (@damiantruerobin), 79 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/damiantruerobin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.