Channel
@dalwen_teacher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
225subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001515603678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dalwen_teacher |
| Description | Дневник учителя |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dalwen_teacher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 225 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 225 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
267 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 61 | 22.8% | |
| ❤ | 59 | 22.1% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 13.5% | |
| 🥰 | 35 | 13.1% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 8.61% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.62% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.375% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2022 to 3 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сделала канал про мои находки для дома. Люблю создавать уют, и обязательно кто-нибудь да спросит, где и как я это всё нахожу. А это обычно просто Озон или Fixprice. 🤷♀️ Но я, видимо, действительно умею находить. 😁 Теперь буду рассказывать об этом тут 👇 https://t.me/dalwen_home
❤7🕊2❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰27
Photo, posted without a caption
😁23🥰8👏2
Это должно быть здесь тоже.)
👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥25❤17👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
👏17❤10🔥3
У каждой ошибки есть причина. Причины могут быть разные. Незнание темы. Проблемы с пониманием темы. Могут быть пробелы в базовых знаниях. Проблемы с вниманием. Усталость. Тревожность, страхи. Могут быть и другие причины. Исправление ошибок (другим человеком, не тем, кто допустил ошибку) помогут решить эти проблемы?
👏16🤔3👍1
Учитель должен замечать ошибки, у себя в голове. Чтобы знать, какой материал следует проработать в следующий раз. А после проработки этого материала можно предложить ученику самому найти свои ошибки. Учитель может научить, не исправив ни одной ошибки. 😉
❤20
Подумайте, зачем исправлять ошибки? Чтобы показать другому, какой он глупый? Чтобы показать другому, какой я умный? Или чтобы помочь, научить? Если мы хотим помочь, то исправлять следует, если о помощи просили. Можно помощь предложить. Если мы хотим научить, то следует помнить, что нельзя научить сразу всему. Выбираем то, чему учим сейчас, и работаем только с этим. Иначе вы только перегрузите оперативную память. 😁
🔥9
А вы знаете, что даже учитель не должен исправлять все-все ошибки? 😉
❤3
Писать грамотно – это личный выбор каждого. Гораздо важней отношение человеческое. Если они говорят "мы не на диктанте" грубо - вот это уже нехорошо. А если написали с ошибкой там, где эта ошибка в целом никому не вредит ‐ ну так что ж?))) Ошибки все допускают. Меня печалит грубое отношение, отсутствие поддержки и неумение общаться. Ошибки же – это ступеньки роста. И повод улыбнуться. По-доброму. 😊
👏15
Чаще всего у тех, кто пишет так, что "кровь из глаз" либо русский не родной, либо есть дислексия/дисграфия или проблемы со слухом или вниманием, либо они дети и только учатся. 😊 И им всем очень, очень нужна поддержка, а не осуждение. И они на самом деле стараются.
😢7❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dalwen_teacher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anna_Belovitskaya” (@dalwen_teacher), 225 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dalwen_teacher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.