Channel
@daite_lapshi_babes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
562subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901912399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daite_lapshi_babes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daite_lapshi_babes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 562 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 567 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 568 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 380 |
| Reactions total | 78 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
78 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5433749085368625469 | 34 | 43.6% | |
| custom 5395338235062788608 | 24 | 30.8% | |
| custom 5260334802925538525 | 20 | 25.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍔🍔 как это началось/как это закончилось Но хэй, зато на свой первый месяц в Китае я заработала сама, наверное, это считается за что-то.. Только что продала однокласснице алёнку за 5 юаней, я обязательно выживу🙏
custom 53953382350627886083custom 52603348029255385252custom 54337490853686254692
🙏🙏 учитель перед экзаменом сказал, что баллов 70 всё равно все получат, и что за списывание отрубят руки, я не понимаю, насколько серьёзно относиться к этому учебному заведению 💓 Ещё есть отвратительная фотка рекомендаций из лоусона: суперское что-то с орео и апельсиновый сок, который на вкус как апельсиновый сок! Без химозного привкуса!
custom 54337490853686254699custom 53953382350627886085custom 52603348029255385254
💓🍜 Сегодня кондиционеры не работали почти нигде💇 🍜 Это невозможно... Где-то полчаса последней пары мы с подружкой просто галлюцинировали, я думаю~ сегодня потратила все свои деньги лол теперь буду 脱贫🙏 🍔 хожу на все мастер-классы, потому что сувениры покупать не на что, я просто выберу 4-5 людей, которым раздам свои поделки, и вообще, кто хочет подарок, пусть кинет денег😒 💓 А ещё китайская цензура запретила мне пет…
custom 52603348029255385256custom 54337490853686254696custom 53953382350627886084
🍔🍔 нужно какое-то название для этого явления, когда я ставлю себя в ПАТОВЫЕ ситуации У меня таких приколов полный рюкзак, даже не всякая мелочь, как сегодня Я вам как-нибудь расскажу, за что меня уволили, и почему я не поехала в Китай на год раньше, хотя могла :D Но сперва сделаю какой-нибудь умный пост, а то вы усомнитесь, как такой человек вообще дожил до своих лет и ещё людей учит, и будет много отписок🫶
custom 54337490853686254695custom 53953382350627886084custom 52603348029255385253
🍔🍔 МЕСТА, В КОТОРЫХ Я ОКАЗАЛАСЬ, ПОКА ИСКАЛА ПОСТАМАТ??? "Ещё чуть-чуть, и я найду страну чудес, но не свою фигурку по магичке" — думала я, агрессивно фотографируя чудеса природы
custom 54337490853686254695custom 53953382350627886084custom 52603348029255385252
💓🍜 забрала утырка на таобао и книжку~ Присаживайтесь — я опять сделала что-то слегка не так 🍔 Прямо напротив входа в наше общежитие есть постамат, очень удобно!.. конечно, я заказала не туда)))) Я заказала в постамат у школы. Ничего страшного, прогуляюсь... и так я прогулялась больше часа, обошла всю территорию кампуса, нашла ЖИВОТНЫХ И ЛОТОСЫ, НО НЕ ТХАМАДЕ ПОСТАМАТ 🍜 Потом я ещё не понимала, как сканировать и …
custom 54337490853686254697custom 53953382350627886084custom 52603348029255385253
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @daite_lapshi_babes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 418,726 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дайте Лапши! 🍜 китайский и всякое” (@daite_lapshi_babes), 562 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daite_lapshi_babes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.