СДЕЛАЙТЕ ТАКОЕ ВИДЕО С ЧЖУНЛЮКАМИ. ЭТО ЖЕ ИХ ЗВУК
❤🔥13❤9👾3💋2🔥1🆒1
Signed скай ♡

Channel
@dailyzhongluc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
285subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001955573299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailyzhongluc |
| Created | 26 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailyzhongluc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 285 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 287 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 285 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 284 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 284 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
788 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429147985688673123 | 131 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5429214918459016801 | 125 | 15.9% | |
| 🍓 | 111 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5429164804780603968 | 95 | 12.1% | |
| 🥰 | 75 | 9.52% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 9.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 69 | 8.76% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 4.82% | |
| 😭 | 27 | 3.43% | |
| 💋 | 15 | 1.90% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 1.78% | |
| 👾 | 6 | 0.761% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.381% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.254% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.254% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.254% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.127% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.127% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 788 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
СДЕЛАЙТЕ ТАКОЕ ВИДЕО С ЧЖУНЛЮКАМИ. ЭТО ЖЕ ИХ ЗВУК
❤🔥13❤9👾3💋2🔥1🆒1
Signed скай ♡
♪``#art ♪`` cr :: shiyashimi on twitter «♡»
🥰33❤🔥13custom 542914798568867312310🔥5custom 54292149184590168014❤2🍓2💋1
Signed наечка ♡
♪``#edit #take ♪`` Ну канон я считаю ♪`cr :: @wdismw on telegram «♡»
custom 542916480478060396820❤8❤🔥6🍓4custom 54291479856886731232custom 54292149184590168011
Signed скай ♡
♪``#edit #take ♪`` Сегодня уже как пол года мне сорол по чжунлюкам не отвечает на пост, поэтому вот вам от меня видосик (Полина, я знаю что ты сидишь в этом канале, я жду пост 😄) Неанон Картон ♪`cr :: @wdismw on telegram «♡»
custom 542921491845901680122❤🔥8custom 54291479856886731236🍓2
Signed скай ♡
реально, с последнего поста почти ничего нового. а ещё админы пропали в рж.
custom 542914798568867312316😭8custom 54291648047806039681
Signed наечка ♡
ну реально уже хер найдешь контента по ним. поэтому ниче не постим(
😭14custom 54291479856886731238custom 54291648047806039681
Signed скай ♡
♪``#take ♪`` Кф немножко умер конечно но я хочу высказаться Почему чжунлюки настолько непопулярный пейринг, ну типо даже в тт про него не говорят толком, а фанатов только в тгк разных искать Честно скажу, я терпеть не могу чайлюков (тарталья и дилюк). Я не понимаю с чего их шипперят вообще, они смотрятся странно тк один типо луна другой солнце, а чжун и дилюк оба луны, и у них отношения не выглядят как абьюзивные.…
custom 542916480478060396830🍓5😭5🥰2custom 54292149184590168012
Signed скай ♡
᠀ㅤׂ ˒˓ ☄️ 𔘏 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 🦅ㅤׄㅤᡣ𐭩 𓈒 ✷ 𓂃 ᰍᰍ 𓂃 ୧ #𝗴𝗶 ୨୧ ────────────────────────── — cr png @Risal_PngGenshin ; cr png @hoyopng ─────────────────────────── #𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 ( #zhongli #diluc ) 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 ; 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 ; 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 ? ¿
custom 542916480478060396828custom 542921491845901680114🔥6custom 54291479856886731236🤯2❤1❤🔥1🍓1
Signed наечка ♡
♪``#edit #take ♪`` привет,я Пико. Я вам принёс видео(там написано Радио т.к. это мой второй ник. Он везде кроме тг) ♪`cr :: _Radio_ on YouTube «♡»
custom 542914798568867312322❤10custom 54292149184590168016🔥3🥰3🍓2💘2custom 54291648047806039681
Signed наечка ♡
♪``#art ♪``cr :: zzz66nemui on twitter «♡»
🍓28custom 54291479856886731238❤7custom 54292149184590168016💋2🔥2❤🔥1👾1
Signed наечка ♡
♪``#art ♪``cr :: zzz66nemui on twitter «♡»
🥰28custom 542921491845901680111🍓7❤6❤🔥3💋2🔥2custom 54291479856886731232
Signed наечка ♡
♪``#take ♪` Ребят, а у какого нибудь есть файл на фанфик "Невеста дракона"? Пожалуйста киньте, его с фб удалили( «♡»
🍓18🔥3❤2😢1custom 54291479856886731231custom 54291648047806039681
Signed наечка ♡
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dailyzhongluc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dailyzhongluc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡ zhongluc timely & confession ♡” (@dailyzhongluc), 285 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailyzhongluc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.