📚🧋
❤24

Channel
@dailymalahat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
915subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001218486980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailymalahat |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailymalahat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 915 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 915 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,256 |
| Reactions total | 439 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
439 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 439 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 439reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚🧋
❤24
ببینید چقدر بامزهست😭
❤31
امروز برای اولین بار سنجاب واقعی دیدم بچهها😭🐿
❤46
همهی نارسیسیستها پر سر و صدا و از خود راضی نیستن. این احتمالا یکی از مهمترین چیزهائیه که باید دربارهی نارسیسیزم بدونیم. همونطور که توی اولین پست گفتم، وقتی میگیم فلانی خودشیفتهست، معمولا یه آدم خیلی برونگرا رو تصور میکنیم که پر از اعتمادبهنفسه، اهل نمایش و عاشق توجهه و دائما در حال تعریف کردن از خودشه. این مدل وجود داره و بهش میگن Grandiose Narcissism یا نارسیسیزم گرندیوز. اما یه مدل دیگه هم هست که از چ…
❤9
چرا بعضی از آدمها با یه انتقاد کوچیک منفجر میشن؟ فرض کنید به کسی میگید "فکر کنم این قسمت کارت میتونست بهتر باشه." و اون شخص واکنشش طوریه که انگار به هویت و شخصیتش توهین شده. چرا؟ یکی از توضیحهای مهم اینه که عزتنفس در نارسیسیزم بالا میتونه شکننده و وابسته به تایید بیرونی باشه. یعنی فرد ممکنه از بیرون خیلی با اعتماد بهنفس به نظر بیاد، اما احساس ارزشمندیش تا حد زیادی به این وابسته باشه که دیگران چطور میبینن…
❤9
اون روزایی که از همهچی زدی تا بتونی تو این مسیر ادامه بدی رو یادت نره. اون روزایی که پولاتو کنار میذاشتی تا بتونی رفرنس بخری رو بازم یادت نره. یادت نره چقدر تلاش کردی، سرمایه و زمانتو بهپاش ریختی تا تو این نقطه وایسی و بگی نمیتونم! من بهت حق میدم خسته بشی. من میدونم تو شرایطی که آدم از یک ثانیهی بعدش خبر نداره، تلاش برای آینده گاهی چقدر پوچ و بی معنی به نظر میاد ولی، اون روز اول که عاشقِ ته این داستان شده بودی،…
❤16
وسط تموم خستگیها و بیحوصلگیهام داشتم به این فکر میکردم که پارسال همین موقعها فیزیولوژی برام یه غول دو سر وحشتناک بود. وقتی میخوندمش فکر میکردم به یه زبون دیگهای نوشته شده. مفاهیمش برام غیر ملموس و مبهم بودن. نمیفهمیدم اصلا پوینت خوندنشون چیه و آرزو میکردم کاش تو کنکور نبود. اما الان بعد از هزار دور مرور و کلنجار رفتن، برام آسونتر شده، آسون و حتی شیرین. خوشم میاد که مطالبش رو میفهمم و لمس میکنم، خوشم میاد…
❤34
من تموم شدم و فیزیولوژی کلب تموم نمیشه.
❤20
و راجع به هزینهای که خودم میگیرم هم میخواستم این شفاف سازی رو بکنم که من تقریبا از همه موسسات مطرح قیمت گرفتم و در نهایت مقدار هزینهای رو انتخاب کردم که پایینتر از همشون باشه تا اخلاقی و منصفانه باشه از این جهت که خب من دیگه درصدی به کسی نمیدم بابت این شهریه. حالا باز دربارهی همین شهریه هم من همیشه موقع ثبتنام یا هر جایی از مسیر، این امکان رو برای بچهها فراهم میکنم که اگر هزینه براشون سنگینه، سر هزینهی ک…
❤24
و نکتهی دیگه اینکه خواهش میکنم گول هزینههای چند میلیونی موسسات مشاورهای رو نخورید. بله بعضیهاشون واقعا خوبن، ولی واقعا قرار نیست کار ماوراییای انجام بدن براتون و شما با نصف همون هزینه هم میتونید به انتظاراتتون از یک مشاور و فرآیند مشاوره برسید. من خودم سه سال تو این موسسات بودم و از نزدیک دیدم قسمت عمدهای از هزینهای که بیانصافانه از دانشآموز میگیرن، بابت تبلیغاته و اصلا این حالتی نیست که چون پول بیشتری ا…
❤20
بچهها راجع به ثبتنام مشاوره این نکته رو هم حواستون باشه که تا یک هفته ضمانت بازگشت شهریه داریم. یعنی اگه شما به هر دلیلی از روند مشاورمون راضی نبودید یا اصلا با من و شیوهی کارم حال نکردید، میتونید هزینهای که پرداخت کردید رو پس بگیرید. دیگه چی از این بهتر؟🙂↔️
❤13
هیچ چیزی بدتر از ناامید کردن خودت نیست. حداقل خودت رو ناامید نکن عزیزم.
❤25
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dailymalahat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 862,343 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دختر مهتاب” (@dailymalahat), 915 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailymalahat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.