Channel
@HomoNocturnal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,888subscribers
+838 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001251766817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @HomoNocturnal @TheNocturnals |
| Description | . . Music Archive: @Nocturnal_Music . . |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HomoNocturnal |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 1,888 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 1,888 | +91 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 1,797 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 1,786 | -13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 1,799 | +36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:53 | 1,763 | +48 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 1,715 | +164 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 1,551 | +42 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 1,509 | +256 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,253 | +139 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 1,114 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 1,123 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 1,117 | +21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,096 | +46 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 1,050 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (3 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,325 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
361 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 345 | 95.6% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 4.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مامانم بهم پیام داد و گفت جمعه برگردم خونه اگر میتونم؛ چون یه مراسمی دارن که همه هستن؛ و من هم در جوابش، بعد از اینکه گفتم حتی اجازه ندارم از محوطهی مرکز هم خارج شم، برای اولین بار راجع به وضعیت زندگیم براش توضیح دادم و در حالی که داشتم اینور چت گریه میکردم، تایپ کردم و گفتم که برنامهم چیه و آپشنهام چیائن و چهقدر همهشون غمانگیز، دور از دسترس و حتی ناممکنن و چهقدر دارم اذیت میشم توی زندگیم. این کار از سم…
Photo, posted without a caption
بزرگترین باگ قسمت عاطفی زندگی من، این بوده که محبت و تاییدی رو که از خونواده دریافت نکردهم، از فرد یا افرادی طلب کردهم که شبیه خونوادهم با من رفتار کردهن، همون قضاوتها رو داشتهن و همون حسها رو منتقل کردهن. انگار که مغزم دنبال این بوده که بالاخره اون "تایید" رو، از خونواده یا کسی شبیه به خونواده، دریافت کنه راجع به خودم. و غمانگیزترین و البته واقعبینانهترین چیزی که راجع به خودم فهمیدهم هم اینه که لایق ای…
Voice message, posted without a caption
https://t.me/c/3970952917/1606
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
این باته هم داره خوب کار میکنه تا اینجا. اگر موقع کار کردن باهاش باگ یا ایرادی دیدید و یا به نظرتون چیزی کم داشت، بهم بگید که به بردهم منتقل کنم و انجامش بده برام.
پرستاری که امروز و فردا اینجا شیفته، همکلاسی و دوست دوران راهنمایی و دبیرستانمه. کلی راجع به اتفاقهایی که طی این سالها برامون افتاده صحبت کردیم. زندگی با هیچکدوممون مهربون نبوده؛ البته، برای اون، توی مبالغ خیلی بالاتری بوده این نامهربونی. تصمیمم برای مهاجرت به تهران رو خیلی محکمتر کرد؛ و خب واقعا امیدوارم چیزها خوب پیش برن بعد از این.
اگر استفاده کردید، بعدا بهم فیدبک بدید در موردش؛ شاید لازم باشه ادیتش کنم.
امروز داشتم به این فکر میکردم که کاش میتونستم برنامهها و پلنهای مشترک با دوستها و خونواده رو یه جایی یادداشت کنم که بهم یادآوری شه، و وقتی انجامشون دادم هم طرف مقابلم متوجه بشه؛ و خب یه بات نوشتم براش(من و کلاد). کارش اینه که با هرکسی که بخوای، یه لیست مشترک میسازی، مثلا "کارهایی که باید با هم انجام بدیم" یا "سفر سمنان" و لینک یا کدش رو براش میفرستی که اد کنه؛ و بعدش میتونی به لیستتون چیزهای مختلف اضافه کنی؛…
نیازم به معاشرت با آدمهام، بیشتر از همیشه شده؛ و انرژیم برای برآورده کردنِ این نیاز، کمتر از همیشه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @HomoNocturnal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nocturnal” (@HomoNocturnal), 1,888 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HomoNocturnal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.