Video, posted without a caption
👍3🔥2❤1

Channel
@daidorogu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
385subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001835329327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daidorogu |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daidorogu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 385 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 384 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 384 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 April 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 350 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 49.5% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 15.4% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
👍3🔥2❤1
Друзья мои, приветствую! Давно ничего не выкладывал. Вчера был на объезде дорог, отремонтированных методом холодной регенерации в Можайском муниципальном округе. Они первыми в Московской области и заложили, и начали реализовывать новый подход. Пообщался с представителем заказчика на месте. Делюсь с вами.
👍2🔥2🤝1
Channel name was changed to «ДАЙ ДОРОГУ VIA EST VITA»
С Днём Великой Победы! Победа будет за нами!
💯1
🕊️ Друзья, поздравляем вас с 9 Мая — с Днём Великой Победы! 🕊️ Это день памяти, силы духа и огромной благодарности людям, которые прошли через страшные испытания ради будущего своей страны и своих близких. Наши предки отстояли Родину ценой невероятного мужества и самоотверженности, и сегодня мы не позволим забыть их подвиг, свои ценности и свою историю. 🎗 Мы продолжим честно трудиться, развивать дорожное дело и про…
❤4
Показалось, что Ольга Геннадьевна предлагает устраивать разделительную прокладку между регенерированным основанием и асфальтобетонным покрытием. Нет, все в порядке, просто графическое разделение слоев. Но не мог не спросить.
👍6🔥2
Благодарю участников за хорошие профессиональные вопросы! Лично для меня количество вопросов - это критерий оценки моего доклада. Сегодня было 3. Кто не успел задать, подходите на ужине, пообщаемся!
❤4👍2🔥1
Ну а потом выступил сам
👏3👍2
Отличный пример дорожной одежды с двумя «укрепленными» слоями: рабочий слой земляного полотна из суглинка, укрепленного комплексным минеральным вяжущим (цемент 3%, известь негашеная 2%) и слой несущего основания ЩГПС на комплексном вяжущем 4% цемента и 6% битумной эмульсии
👍2🔥2❤1
Воробьева Ольга Геннадьевна о факторах долговечности дорожных одежд. Обожаю её доклады, потому что в них акцент всегда на прочность ОСНОВАНИЯ ДО. Зеленым обвел стабилизацию ❤🔥
🔥4❤1👍1
Высокопрофессиональный доклад Майдановой Натальи Васильевны, АБЗ-1, СПб от практика и не побоюсь этого слова научного деятеля в области асфальтобетонных смесей, охватывающий влияние всех факторов.
👍3❤1👏1🤝1
Николай Викторович рассказал про нормативку и сделал акцент на дорожном образовании. В пользу забираем «Методические рекомендации по внедрению инноваций в системе Федерального дорожного агентства»!
👍3❤2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daidorogu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДАЙ ДОРОГУ VIA EST VITA” (@daidorogu), 385 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daidorogu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.