Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

kang dae-ho confession !

@daehoconf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

711subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389726447
TypeChannel
Username@daehoconf
Description@daehoconfbot администрация не несёт ответственности за выложенные тейки
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/daehoconf

Growth

7117 Aug 2026, 15:30 — 711 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:17 — 711 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:308 Aug 2026, 02:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 710–712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:17711no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:30711first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,180
Videos
357
Links
440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

539 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥11220.8%
💘9918.4%
9617.8%
custom 54473813459258822426111.3%
🍓509.28%
💋437.98%
custom 5467615825915567090356.49%
😭152.78%
🕊101.86%
🥰50.928%
custom 541606543799566063040.742%
😢30.557%
🤝30.557%
🔥20.371%
👀10.186%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daehoconf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 September 2025 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 10:04 UTC421 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026

друзья, наконец-то вышел третий сезон! надеюсь нам раскроют дэхо и расскажут его предысторию. всем хорошего просмотра 👍 а если без шуток, то пролетел уже год с выхода блин...

💘35😭15🍓4💋4

29 Mar 2026, 11:56 UTC670 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а если я снова начну постить...

❤‍🔥287💋7💘2

29 Mar 2026, 11:52 UTC679 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

29❤‍🔥9🥰5🍓1💋1💘1

20 Feb 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,820 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

в корее уже 21 февраля, идёт ханыль дей! но где-то ещё 20, то есть владелец дэхокф дей!!! поздравлять обоих 😌😌 да опять врываюсь и что! рассказывайте, как дела

❤‍🔥37🍓11💋92💘2

30 Dec 2025, 20:07 UTC≈1,160 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐯#take годы идут а катися все также не умеет рисовать прическу дехо и все также рисует только анимешные лица 🤓 что то большее чем скетчи не будет у меня болит башка неанон катися 🌟 @daehoconfbot

19🍓5❤‍🔥4💋2

30 Dec 2025, 19:55 UTC905 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давайте поболтаем, как в старые-добрые как вообще у вас дела, друзья? есть новогоднее настроение?? в каких фандомах щяс активничаете? 😜😜

💋15❤‍🔥53🍓2

30 Dec 2025, 19:45 UTC809 views66 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐯#take ; #art ; #namgyu ну я закину сюда дэгю да неанон: мр.кокссс @daehoconfbot

💘3513❤‍🔥8💋3😢3🍓2🔥2

14 Dec 2025, 21:34 UTC879 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вы хотите перерождение конфы?...

23🕊10🤝3👀1💋1💘1

14 Dec 2025, 21:34 UTC798 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

привет, подпишитесь, это бесплатно, там ещё и пост для реквестов есть...

💘4

14 Dec 2025, 21:33 UTC796 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩😻 — исследуя просторы глубин телеграма, вы откапываете на рукописи, ❌❌ написанные одним любителем совсем-совсем недавно ... ❗ ❌😻 ✍️ я — кёртис (кликабельно для инфо), фикрайтер, который, в основном, пишет на дорамную тематику. ❤️ 😻🪦🤩🤩🪦 ⭐ 😻базовая информация обо мне: 🌟 she/her ! 🌟 intp, 3w4 🌟 пишу зарисовки и фанфики по дорамам, а так же иногда делюсь своими мыслями о просмотренном. могу выкладывать хедканоны, эди

1 Oct 2025, 19:35 UTC≈1,140 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @squidgamekf388Photo

⚪🔺⬛Хей, хей, хеей, ты попал в уютный уголок фанатов игры в кальмара! Не знаешь, куда выложить свой арт/эдит/хэд/теорию? Устал от хейт-кф и токсисности в фандоме? — Тебе сюда ;) ⚪У нас есть буквально ВСЁ: фреймы, мемы, арты, эдиты, шипы🤫, новости, факты, теории, косплеи, обсуждения и всё, что связанно с этой прекрасной дорамой 🔺 ⬛Присоединяйся скорее <3 [ВЕСЬ ТЕКСТ КЛИКАБЕЛЕН] (Псс, у нас есть своя предложка, для пр

custom 54473813459258822429💋1💘1

1 Oct 2025, 17:56 UTC764 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐯#take тгк: @stariot23 @daehoconfbot

custom 544738134592588224212custom 54676158259155670903🍓2💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @daehoconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 691,420 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kang dae-ho confession !” (@daehoconf), 711 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daehoconf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.