Channel
@dadsmoonshine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555858599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dadsmoonshine |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dadsmoonshine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 82 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 82 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 18 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
293 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 124 | 42.3% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 23.2% | |
| 🥰 | 46 | 15.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 6.83% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 6.14% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 3.07% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2024 to 31 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Коты, с наступающим☺️ Ну и напоследок #artvsartist Этот год выдался плодотворным. Даже было из чего выбирать. Мб ещё соберу с дневниковыми и драмионтоберовскими😏 Но самое важное достижение — я наконец-то встречаю Новый год. Предыдущие два выдались с температурой и безалкогольным шампанским. Не болейте, сладкие😘
❤15🔥8❤🔥4
🤩Три тома 🤩 Более 1000 страниц и 150 иллюстраций 🤩Открытки, закладки и стикеры Стань владельцем крестража
🔥10❤2❤🔥2
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤Воспоминание, разбитое 🔤на тысячу осколков, не 🔤перестает быть воспоминанием. 🔤Вместо одного появляется 🔤тысяча памятных моментов. 🔤И каждый из них становится 🔤началом новой истории... 🔤 💎💎💎💎💎🔤💎💎 🔤 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 🔤🔤🔤🔤 📕 🔤 ➰🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔤 🔤 представляют 🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🔤🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 Осколки темнейших воспоминаний 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🐍
🔥10❤4❤🔥2
🎇🐉🐉 🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉 🐉 🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🎇 Подарки от Тайного Санты Невезение, стечение обстоятельств или судьба? Гермиона не знала, кого винить в своих злоключениях. Но теперь она оказалась в сороковых и из-за глупой жеребьёвки должна подобрать подарок самому Тому Риддлу. Автор: Nelleh Артер: Dad's moonshine Бета: Annkalia PG-13, мини томиона метки: AU, Юмор, Новый год, ООС, Романтика, Начало отношений, Хронофантастика, Артефакт…
🔥11❤2❤🔥1
Бу! Испугался? Не бойся, я друг… Чтобы вы понимали, этот пост в заметках настаивался настолько долго, что мем успел покрыться пылью. Уже больше месяца назад отметила др. И спасибо наитемнейшему за милую открытку с поздравлением, а не громовещатель с угрозами. За отсутствующие обложки у участников второго этапа подозревала, что меня будут искать с оборотнями Фенрира, чтобы отвесить смачных люлей. Простите, котятки. …
❤11
🔤🔤🔤🔤 #Dramiontober
🥰16❤9
Художник
❤12🔥5
Псссссс Щекастого мамкиного симпатягу вам принесла🌚
Отдохнула и вновь в строю. Принесла вам детский впуквел/вбоквел из параллельной вселенной к 16 и 17 дням (еще б я их делала вовремя, но это уже детали😄) А завтра будет 19. Скетч уже готов, остался цвет😎
❤9🥰8😍4
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 #Dramiontober
❤13🔥7😍4
Пов: она пыталась найти дополнительную мотивацию на отрисовку скетчей ко второму тому и не придумала ничего лучше, чем расчехлить покрытый пылью гуглдок 💅🏻
🥰8
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔤 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔤🔠🔠 🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Автор: Dad's Moonshine Телеграм-канал 🔥Небольшое интервью с автором: 1. Почему вы выбрали именно этих персонажей? Изначально я прочитала правила левой пяткой и задумала эдакий любовный треугольник, где персонажи Регулуса и Гермионы должны были предаться прекрасной метке СОП. Да, я та еще драма квин. Но потом Мерлин открыл мне глаза, пришлось выпутываться из ситуации, а заодно…
😍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dadsmoonshine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,421,830 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dad’s Moonshine” (@dadsmoonshine), 82 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dadsmoonshine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.