Приложение VK тоже пропало из Google Play. Также удаляются и другие проекты от VK 👋
❤5👍3👎3🤯2🤔1

Channel
@da_ponomarenk0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
177subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081422554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @da_ponomarenk0 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/da_ponomarenk0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 177 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 173 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 173 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
206 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5323445675143239501 | 40 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5427017097794317095 | 35 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5283105267829997242 | 28 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5368671792439267419 | 27 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5282903168143882850 | 23 | 11.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 9.22% | |
| custom 5323401647433487048 | 9 | 4.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 2.43% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| custom 5271781135582504502 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.971% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приложение VK тоже пропало из Google Play. Также удаляются и другие проекты от VK 👋
❤5👍3👎3🤯2🤔1
Ой ой, отечественный мессенджер MAX исчез из Google Play. Бан?) 😁
❤9😁3👎1🤔1
❗️Платная магистраль «Ленинградское шоссе — 3-я Магистральная улица»: продолжаем доносить до чиновников позицию жителей По итогам нашей встречи с жителями Щукино, СЗАО и САО, депутатами Госдумы от КПРФ уже направлены запросы: ♦️Мэру Москвы — С.С. Собянину [текст запроса] ♦️Прокурору Москвы — М.С. Жуку [текст запроса] ♦️Руководителю Дептранса и развития транспортной инфраструктуры Москвы — М.С. Ликсутову [текст за…
❤5❤🔥5🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54270170977943170958custom 52831052678299972424custom 53234016474334870481custom 53686717924392674191
⚡️ГБУ «Автомобильные дороги» затеяло благоустройство на Тепличном переулке, но почему-то забыло спросить местных жителей, как это делать. В зону попал участок между домами на тепличном переулке 4 и 10. ⁉️ 21 июня рядом со старой опорой освещения возвели новую — модель СП400-9.0-22-ц. Она выше, с двумя лампами без абажуров и светит так, что будет мешать спать жителям до 5-го этажа в домах 4 и 10. Это светильник для м…
custom 53234456751432395016custom 52829031681438828504custom 53234016474334870484custom 54270170977943170953custom 52831052678299972421
🟥📱Депутаты от КПРФ выступили против блокировки Telegram 🛠Депутаты Государственной Думы от КПРФ обратились к главе Минцифры Максуту Шадаеву с просьбой отменить блокировку Telegram. ‼️Коммунисты отметили, что блокировка является нецелесообразной: количество преступлений, совершаемых с помощью Telegram не уменьшилось, а на сами блокировки тратятся миллиарды рублей. ☄️Газета.ru осветила эту новость одной из первых. Св…
custom 53686717924392674197custom 52831052678299972423custom 53234456751432395013
⚡️ СЗАО и САО Москвы против платной магистрали! В Щукино прошла огромная встреча депутата Госдумы от КПРФ с жителями СЗАО и САО против строительства платной магистрали по парку Покровское-Стрешнево. 👩 Несмотря на ряд провокаций, участники встречи единогласно потребовали: ⚠️ Незамедлительной приостановки работ и ознакомления широкой общественности с проектной документации ⚠️ Проведения аудита проекта со стороны Кон…
custom 53234456751432395019custom 54270170977943170954custom 52831052678299972423
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54270170977943170956custom 53234456751432395013custom 52829031681438828502
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54270170977943170956custom 52831052678299972424custom 52829031681438828502
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53234456751432395019custom 52829031681438828502custom 54270170977943170952
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 528290316814388285012custom 54270170977943170953custom 52717811355825045022
Да.Пономаренко pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @da_ponomarenk0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 809,715 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Да.Пономаренко” (@da_ponomarenk0), 177 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/da_ponomarenk0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.