Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Demo101 Germany in English

Channel

Demo101 Germany in English

@d101germany_en

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002464628442
TypeChannel
Username@d101germany_en
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/d101germany_en

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

202321.510 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers3 October 2026 — 23 subscribers10 August 20263 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 55 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 23:0223+3
11 Aug 2026, 16:1620no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:3220first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1442.4%
💯927.3%
❤‍🔥39.09%
🔥39.09%
😱26.06%
👍13.03%
👏13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Dec 2025, 15:07 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

In spring 2026, the German government plans to pass a law that would require providers to store all IP addresses of visited websites. This poses a significant risk for increased repression, which is why we want to encourage people to engage with the topic of “Safe Internet Browsing.” There are tools available for this purpose, such as the Tor Browser Bundle and various so-called VPNs, which increase the protection of…

❤2

14 Dec 2025, 21:50 UTC155 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

In light of the new Police Law taking effect in Berlin, which grants authorities expanded powers such as remote access to devices (laptops and smartphones) and covert entry into homes to install surveillance software (e.g., state Trojans/malicious data collection software), we would like to share our Digital Protection Guidelines with you. These have been developed in collaboration with cybersecurity experts and acti…

❤6

24 Aug 2025, 15:53 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

VG and OVG Berlin 22.8.2025: Protest camp over Gaza war may return to the Chancellery The Higher Administrative Court (OVG) emphasized that the protest camp near the Federal Chancellery, by its mere presence at such a politically significant location, creates a “certain effect of expression.” In addition, over the past few days there had been “a whole series of elements typical of demonstrations.” The court did not …

💯2

30 Jul 2025, 14:56 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Once again, there was an acquittal/ found not guilty today for using the slogan "From the river to the sea....", according to the Tiergarten District Court. Protesters are often disproportionately targeted by the police for this and frequently experience extreme police violence — ranging from broken bones to unconsciousness. Source: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/anklage-wegen-parole-from-the-river-to-the-sea-propa…

❤‍🔥3👏1

10 Jun 2025, 21:00 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

As reported by the community, police are arresting people they believe they identified at the Nakba demonstration on May 15th, 2025. If you see someone being arrested randomly (especially if they are wearing a keffiyeh), please read the following out loud from a safe distance — even if the police rudely and disrespectfully tell you to leave. You are not required to comply with such orders: - What is your full name a…

😱2👍1

28 May 2025, 15:13 UTC52 viewsread 11 August 2026

Freedom of Assembly Also with Plastic Visor Referring to a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the article argues that the legal interpretation should be changed so that protective gear such as helmets or visors is not treated as “passive armament” but recognized as legitimate self-protection within the scope of the right to assembly. 🚨 This does not function as a legal green light, but rather as …

22 May 2025, 21:18 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Dear Community, We are looking for photos that clearly show a police officer wearing weighted-knuckle gloves / Quartzhandschuhe. If you have more detailed information about this — optionally including location, date, and time (not required) — please fill out the following: https://cryptpad.fr/form/#/2/form/view/VPYFmRcJ6VJJy4qci3ktN6b2OTsUzgL-80arW+RSJE0/

💯1

15 May 2025, 16:01 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026

The ruling got overturned by higher administrative court in Berlin. The demonstration is going to be stationary.

15 May 2025, 10:34 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Administrative Court Berlin 15 May 2025: Unlawful restriction of an assembly to a stationary rally instead of a march on Nakba Day Source: Prof. Dr. Clemens Arzt

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @d101germany_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Demo101 Germany in English” (@d101germany_en), 23 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d101germany_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.