Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

doomtaker 🐟

@d00mtaker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

185subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002673952265
TypeChannel
Username@d00mtaker
Descriptionhave you tried giving up and using hard drugs?
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/d00mtaker

Growth

1856 Aug 2026, 19:51 — 185 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:33 — 185 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:517 Aug 2026, 07:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 184–186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:33185no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51185first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
137.8%
avg views ÷ 185 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,313
Reactions total264
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
374
Videos
18
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541368878777764502413940.1%
custom 54136578854879521499226.5%
custom 53822104098245253566719.3%
custom 54137234696385610064914.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @d00mtaker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC117 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вот такие пироги #ос

custom 541365788548795214913custom 54136887877776450243custom 54137234696385610062custom 53822104098245253561

30 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC269 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

первый так называемый мерч

custom 541368878777764502424custom 53822104098245253565custom 54137234696385610065

26 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC249 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

у меня есть ощущение что я не закончу поэтому держите огрызок

custom 541368878777764502418custom 54136578854879521493custom 54137234696385610063custom 53822104098245253561

21 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC252 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @illumnieholdafrogPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54136887877776450247custom 54136578854879521494custom 54137234696385610064

20 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC235 viewsread 7 August 2026

можете докинуть если еще хотите я отрисую еще штук 10 мб пока что есть 4 которые я не отрисовал еще так что кидайте 😋

19 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC264 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

и мои

custom 541368878777764502415custom 54137234696385610066custom 54136578854879521494

19 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC467 views36 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

некоторых не отрисовал потому что был не полнорост/непонятный мне дизайн поэтому можете кинуть кого-то другого остальных отрисую потом

custom 538221040982452535619custom 54136578854879521499custom 54136887877776450248

18 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC242 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

скиньте своих персонажей любых я хочу сделать что-то смешное

custom 54136578854879521495

17 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC287 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

что-то что напоминает тебя #ос

custom 541368878777764502414custom 54137234696385610066custom 54136578854879521493custom 53822104098245253561

16 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC260 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

#арт

custom 541365788548795214912custom 54137234696385610065custom 54136887877776450244custom 53822104098245253561

15 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC260 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 541365788548795214911custom 54137234696385610063custom 54136887877776450242custom 53822104098245253561

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @d00mtaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 234,900 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“doomtaker 🐟” (@d00mtaker), 185 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d00mtaker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.