Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vlad&slava。

Channel

vlad&slava。

@cyrwer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060786196
TypeChannel
Username@cyrwer
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cyrwer

Growth

8614 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 86 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 04:18 — 86 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 16:0115 Aug 2026, 04:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:1886no change
14 Aug 2026, 16:0186first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 13 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52648420575700863955716.3%
custom 5334621798522706366339.46%
custom 5343643119629922045339.46%
329.17%
custom 5408983165773571085257.16%
custom 5296582389873526775236.59%
custom 5416118300453138113216.02%
custom 5240458140956256867195.44%
custom 5309923928389469033185.16%
custom 5296254559314789938133.72%
custom 5357277746714133355123.44%
custom 531239952176909041392.58%
custom 530319263230489072582.29%
custom 541109722598606390082.29%
custom 542235135885654470482.29%
💘72.01%
custom 527390789601330739361.72%
61.72%
🎄61.72%
custom 525843715323018800520.573%
2 further kinds30.86%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2025 to 9 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cyrwer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2025 to 9 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTC336 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 541109722598606390086custom 53099239283894690336👻1💘1

9 Jan 2026, 17:19 UTC290 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8custom 53123995217690904137💘6custom 53099239283894690332

31 Dec 2025, 23:10 UTC381 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

с новым годом 🎄

86🎄6🍾2custom 53123995217690904132

22 Aug 2025, 17:35 UTC≈1,040 views25 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53346217985227063668custom 53436431196299220458custom 53099239283894690337custom 53572777467141333552

30 Jul 2025, 06:09 UTC≈1,130 views33 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 541611830045313811311custom 53031926323048907258custom 53346217985227063668custom 54089831657735710856

30 Jul 2025, 06:08 UTC≈1,070 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52648420575700863955custom 52965823898735267754custom 53572777467141333554

30 Jul 2025, 04:19 UTC868 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026

в четыре утра было принято решение поехать на ранней электричке в Карелию (мы еле успели)

custom 540898316577357108512custom 53436431196299220459custom 52648420575700863957custom 52965823898735267751

26 Jul 2025, 22:32 UTC908 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52648420575700863959custom 53346217985227063669custom 53572777467141333556custom 52962545593147899382custom 53436431196299220452

26 Jul 2025, 22:25 UTC840 views33 reactions5 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐мне нечего особо выкладывать сюда 🚬

custom 534364311962992204514custom 52965823898735267759custom 54089831657735710857custom 52962545593147899381custom 53099239283894690331custom 53346217985227063661

3 Jul 2025, 01:56 UTC863 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026

че как вам финал игры в кальмара? (время красивое)

custom 52648420575700863958custom 53346217985227063667custom 52965823898735267755custom 53099239283894690332

5 Jun 2025, 17:05 UTC≈1,090 views31 reactionsread 14 August 2026

концерт концертом, а блок баст по расписанию

custom 526484205757008639511custom 54161183004531381138custom 52404581409562568677custom 52739078960133073933custom 54223513588565447042

5 Jun 2025, 17:04 UTC≈1,030 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 524045814095625686710custom 529625455931478993885custom 52648420575700863952custom 52965823898735267752custom 52739078960133073931

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cyrwer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,342,999 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vlad&slava。” (@cyrwer), 86 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyrwer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.