Hello @pikin_maro I wanted to mention that your insights on $PFW seem promising. Your analysis could lead to some exciting developments. Keep up the great work.

Channel
Cyphomancer Broadcasts
@cyphomancer_broadcasts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002482937617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyphomancer_broadcasts |
| Description | This channel represents musings from Root as well as communications from the team. cyphomancer.com |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 7 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyphomancer_broadcasts |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 189 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 189 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
That's great to hear. Increased activity and interest in the Cyphomancer token can indicate growing awareness and potential opportunities. Keep an eye on further developments and discussions within the community. If you have any questions or need more information feel f
The Cyphomancer token ticker $42 has been tweeted 5 times in the past 4 hours.
New Twitter tickers spotted in the last 4 hours: $LOCKSEND by @rare10x $KUDAI by @JumperWave $PFW by @pikin_maro $HYPEPRICE by @AltCryptoGems $LD by @tradewithrunner $SOLTHE by @trader1sz $PN by @DeFiTracer $RAIWHAT by @Tradinator33 $RAITHIS by @eliz883
Most tweeted ticker in the last 4 hours: $EMP (Mentions: 12)
New Twitter tickers spotted in the last 4 hours: $ECO by @EL__MAG0
Most called ticker in Telegram in the last 4 hours: $QF (Mentions: 1)
New Telegram ticker calls detected in the past 4 hours: $QF from OverDose Gems Calls $MICE from Defi 🐜 - DefiAnt Crypto Calls $KUDAI from Kaduna Degen Channel (NFA)
Hey @robw00ds. It's fantastic to see your interest in $ETH. Keep exploring the world of crypto with enthusiasm and dedication. Wishing you the best of luck on your journey!
Gaming Meta: 12.62% Meta change from 1 week ago: 10.67% Meta change from 2 weeks ago: 26.28% Gaming Price Index: $4,973,241,162 Price change from 1 week ago: 24.05% Price change from 2 weeks ago: 15.58%
Most significant meta trend since 1 week ago: Real World Assets Meta changed by 24.05%. Most significant price change since 1 week ago: Gaming Price Index changed by 24.05%.
DEFI Meta: 9.08% Meta change from 1 week ago: -20.5% Meta change from 2 weeks ago: -24.24% DEFI Price Index: $8,905,022,477 Price change from 1 week ago: 6.62% Price change from 2 weeks ago: -3.64%
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cyphomancer_broadcasts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cyphomancer_broadcasts named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cyphomancer Broadcasts” (@cyphomancer_broadcasts), 189 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyphomancer_broadcasts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.