Channel
@cyberstresser
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001503941202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberstresser |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberstresser |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 272 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 275 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 275 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 8 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Fixed all minor issues, attacks were optimized to start faster now Layer7 methods were all updated to work with recent patches fully bypassing once again for all commonly known protections Introducing more options for Layer4 towards more protective firewalls that limit our attacks, rate limit coming soon Discount Code: H1 Best Regards, @relx085
Enabled our proxy once again due to random errors occurring from small attackers, all minor issues resolved with this as well Best Regards, @relx085
HTTP DDoS rates lowered while still being at a high request per second rate, Botnet attacks being updated everyday to better your experience Best Regards, @relx085
With the addition of our new servers we are expected to have 600G for amplified attacks, as of now we peak at 450G or less depending on load slots will also increase during this period. Browser attacks are now stronger, bypassing CloudFlare UAM targets once again Layer7 attacks automatically refresh now, pool is constantly changing rather then large and changed non frequently Best Regards, @relx085
We have thoroughly reviewed and removed all from the blacklist that might be perceived as potential targets Best Regards, @relx085
An important enhancement to our infrastructure is something we are thrilled to announce. We will be switching to a new generation of servers as part of our commitment to provide unmatched service and performance for the price. We constantly work to get better and innovate. even at peak usages, with separate power channels for each concurrent to our customers. Best Regards, @relx085
😅commerce.coinbase BYPASS against Cloudflare Website https://check-host.net/check-report/10faac29k77d
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @cyberstresser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 923,894 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CyberStress | News” (@cyberstresser), 272 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberstresser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.