Channel
@cyberpipe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
209subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413477577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberpipe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberpipe |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 209 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 210 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 210 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
111 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 27.0% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 25.2% | |
| 🍌 | 22 | 19.8% | |
| 🌭 | 11 | 9.91% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 4.50% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 4.50% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.60% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.80% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.80% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Главная причина ревизии — антенна — работает. Пока глубоко не тестировал, но поднимает сеть и подключается к существующим хорошо. Уровень сигнала, откровенно говоря, мог бы быть повыше. Немного уменьшил дизайн. Тут нечего добавить. Надо собрать какое-нибудь устройство с этими платами в таком случае.
❤5
Вторая ревизия плат Попозже отфоткаю и напишу о результатах тестов
✍3
Video, posted without a caption
🍌3🆒2🤔1
Video, posted without a caption
🍌3❤1
Pureberry теперь публичный С помощью этого проекта вы можете компилировать патчи PureData под популярные платы RP2350. Работа сейчас сконцентрирована на повышении функциональности, в планах: поддержка tables и подгрузка их с флешки по USB, улучшение системы профилей оверклокинга, более продвинутый UI с возможностью управления параметрами патча, возможно другие I2C датчики (кроме тач сенсора MPR121), MIDI. Ваш миним…
❤11🔥8🍌3🆒1
Video, posted without a caption
🌭5👍2
Прототип синтезатора, отладочная плата. Помог развести и напечатал Артём
❤6🍌3🆒2
Оказывается, можно сделать так, чтобы плата определялась как аудиокарта, а звук с компьютера можно подать в ноду adc~ (как вход в pd патче) Я просто из спортивного интереса имплементировал эту фичу и сложно описать как я офигел с того, что это вообще возможно Можно ещё и обратный захват сделать (в компьютер с платы), но пока не могу понять зачем
🔥5✍2❤2🍌1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3
На текущий момент: 1. Используется оба ядра, под синтез звука выделено отдельное. Теоретически это выжимает максимум из вычислительных возможностей, дальше только разгон. Но предел пока не достигнут даже без многоядерности. 2. Полноценное USB MIDI 3. Можно светить адресным RGB светодиодом из патча 4. Экран, вывел аудиобуфер, получился такой осциллограф 5. Работают ручки потенциометров (крутилки) Pure Data — это нодо…
🌭6🔥5⚡2
Вернулся к запуску pure data на микроконтроллерах. С тех пор вышел новый raspberry rp2350, который уже имеет FPU и даже DSP инструкции. Немного повозился с тем чтобы пересобрать проект с нуля, но в конечном итоге без всяких проблем компилирую и запускаю патчи на микроконтроллере. В этот раз даже пошел дальше и уже работаю над связью между патчем и крутилками, светодиодами. Пока оценить производительность не получаетс…
🍌3🔥3❤2
делаем артворк с @nefedkin
🍌3🤔3🌚2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cyberpipe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bright Brains” (@cyberpipe), 209 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberpipe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.