Channel
@cyberleekernews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004411331706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberleekernews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 27 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberleekernews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 27 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 28 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 27 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 7 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (27 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 108 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗞📢 For Important Information, check the pinned 📌messages about if needed. You will find all necessary information about CyberLeek and his posts, etc there. Thank you for following the drama! 🗞📢 Важная информация — при необходимости ознакомьтесь с закреплёнными 📌сообщениями. Там вы найдёте всю необходимую информацию о CyberLeek, его публикациях и т. д. Спасибо, что следите за сериалом! 👀👇Это будет последнее, что я зд…
CyberLeek News pinned a file
This news translated to English from Russian from a Russian GTAVI News Group 🇷🇺➡️🇬🇧https://t.me/ru_gtavi
Опубликовал - https://t.me/ru_gtavi/1328
🧐 What could this mean? First theory: CyberLeek (https://t.me/cyberleekario) may have been caught, and control of his channels has passed to other people. Now someone is trying to profit from his name and the hype: selling images, access, and subscriptions—in other words, essentially scamming the audience. This theory makes sense because Leek himself never built a paid scheme around the leaks before. He published inf…
📰 What’s Going On with CyberLeek: An Arrest, Going Underground, or a Scam in the Leaker’s Name? 🤩 Recent developments in CyberLeek’s groups are raising more and more questions. His activity has changed drastically, and instead of the usual posts, paid “images (https://t.me/cyberleekario/348)” have begun to appear, riddles (https://t.me/leekcorp/8), and promises (https://t.me/cyberleekario/328) of material that ultim…
📄Dropping the official docs today, fuck it got nothing to lose anymore . RIP CyberLeek - 28/08/2026 - 23:26 This will hopefully be the finale in the CyberLeek drama trilogy here. If anyone wants to take over, comment or DM me and I'll make you mod here
❤2
>Releases 'GTA VI leaked build' >Asks to DM him the code for the puzzle >Charges ⭐️300 for each message Get the fuck outta here
❤1
I am done covering CyberLeek's alleged TG/internet drama . This guy just posts bullshit . "Breaking the internet tomorrow" yet doing nothing . Liar and idiot .
Discussions here for those who wanna talk about topics https://t.me/boost/cyberleektalk
CyberLeek News pinned «📢 GTA VI PC BUILD LEAK codes leekcorp.arewe.io Layer 03: 69767686527910201470114190819986235823649447358548328918666874785911783787571 Layer 04: 1546951318675991798865677780272466 scroll up for part 1&2 if you missed it good luck 👋»
"Should We Drop It Today ?" You won't drop shit anyways so stfu 😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cyberleekernews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CyberLeek Exposed | News” (@cyberleekernews), 27 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberleekernews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.