Channel
@cyber_litclub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003738998470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyber_litclub |
| Created | 8 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyber_litclub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 57 | +16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 41 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 42 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 40 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 36 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 35 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 35 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
63 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 49.2% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 12.7% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.59% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На скільки сітуейшншипів з 10 оцінюєте «Невеличку драму» Валерʼяна Підмогильного? 🪷🍵
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁3👍1
Нагадуємо, що, для гостей нашого факультету, в нас є відео з детальним маршрутом як пройти від станції метро «Виставковий центр» до Читалки ФКНК
❤2💘2
КУБІК: літературний pinned a video
Українська класика, яка не застаріла 📰 Літо минає швидко, але хороші розмови про книжки запам’ятовуються надовго 🌊 Тож запрошуємо на липневу зустріч, присвячену роману Валер’яна Підмогильного «Невеличка драма» — одному з найцікавіших філософських романів української літератури ХХ століття. Попри те, що роман написаний майже сто років тому, він порушує питання, які залишаються близькими й сьогодні: чи можна пояснит…
❤3🍓1💋1💘1
На скільки балів оцінюєте «Який чудесний світ новий!» Олдоса Гакслі?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1🍓1🤔1
Сесія позаду, тож настав час поговорити не лише про дедлайни, а й про літературу 📰 Цього разу читацький клуб обговорював роман «Який чудесний світ новий!» Олдоса Гакслі. Під час зустрічі ми дискутували про межі свободи, щастя та контролю в суспільстві, а також спробували себе в ролі творців ідеального світу — на інтерактиві кожен мав змогу долучитися до створення спільної утопії, яка в процесі несподівано перетворил…
❤5❤🔥2🥰2🍓1
Нагадуємо про реєстрацію! ✍ Чекаємо тебе на зустрічі нашого читацького клубу вже завтра, тож не забудь зареєструватися. Також просимо взяти із собою ручку, а для чого саме — дізнаєшся вже на зустрічі! За бажанням можна також прихопити печиво та улюблене горнятко. 🤩🍪
✍1❤1🍓1
📌 Як добратися до місця зустрічі книжкового клубу? Для всіх, хто ще не був у Читалці ФКНК, підготували коротке відео з маршрутом від станції метро «Виставковий центр»
❤13🍓2
До нашої читацької зустрічі залишається менше тижня 🌟 Сподіваємося, знайомство з книжкою йде повним ходом. Тож пропонуємо поділитися своїми читацькими звичками: який формат подобається вам найбільше?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍓3❤1
Час відкривати нові світи 🤩 Запрошуємо тебе на затишну зустріч нашого читацького клубу — з розмовами, чаєм, печивом і книгою, яка точно змусить замислитися. На червневу зустріч ми читаємо культову антиутопію Олдоса Гакслі «Який чудесний світ новий!» 📚 Історія про ілюзію ідеального суспільства, де живі емоції та свобода волі опинилися під забороною. Разом ми зазирнемо за лаштунки цієї утопії, щоб зрозуміти, якою є…
❤5🍓1
Зустріч про те, що болить 🫂 Уже цієї суботи запрошуємо тебе на теплу зустріч нашого читацького клубу — з розмовами, чаєм, печивом і книгою, що точно зачепить. Цього разу обговорюємо книгу Артура Дроня «Гемінґвей нічого не знає» — чесну й дуже живу історію, написану молодим військовим. Це книга про фронтову реальність, віру, страх і надію, смерть і любов, а також братерство, що тримає людей у найважчі моменти. Це н…
❤🔥6😍2
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cyber_litclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На скільки сітуейшншипів з 10 оцінюєте «Невеличку драму» Валерʼяна Підмогильного? 🪷🍵
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На скільки балів оцінюєте «Який чудесний світ новий!» Олдоса Гакслі?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
До нашої читацької зустрічі залишається менше тижня 🌟 Сподіваємося, знайомство з книжкою йде повним ходом. Тож пропонуємо поділитися своїми читацькими звичками: який формат подобається вам найбільше?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КУБІК: літературний” (@cyber_litclub), 57 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyber_litclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.