Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
7,670 average views per post against 1,855 subscribers — an engagement rate of 413.7%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
115,110
Mature posts only
413.7% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,840–1,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 00:31
1,855
-92
8 Aug 2026, 02:54
1,947
-7
7 Aug 2026, 20:46
1,954
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:43
1,954
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
413.7%
avg views ÷ 1,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,670
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
15 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
115,110
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Кримсон шмотки вышли, сундук могут получить только зрители Инта с билетами на арене, во время первой крови в матче
Цены на имморталки будут около 20-80 тыс. рублей
@cyber_2news
Фарм всегда выгоднее драк
Nix рассказал, что ему тяжело адаптироваться к современной Доте — фарм поощряется гораздо больше:
Я не получаю удовольствия от PvE. Пэтому, допустим, когда я выбирал между World of Warcraft и Lineage, я играл в Lineage.
Мне всегда нравился PvP. Я хочу драться, а сейчас в Доте невыгодно драться — сейчас в Доте выгодно фармить.
Самый эффективный плей всегда будет фарм, потому что фарм мате…
Инт сможет набрать нормальный призовой?
Компендиум уже смог принести $326.000 в казну призового фонда — в прошлом году за такое же время набралось всего $56.000
Какую сумму успеет собрать?
@cyber_2news
Скам от валв — они утверждают что имморталки в цветах этого года, хотя фиолетовый был в прошлом году
Надеемся на правильный золотой стиль, как разрабы заметят
@cyber_2news
Уходит целая эпоха
По слухам этот The International может стать последним для Team Falcons — Cr1t и Sneyking могут завершить карьеру
Смогут стать чемпионами напоследок?
@cyber_2news
Большой призовой на Инте — плохо для киберспорта
Gorgc рассказал, что большой призовой фонд вредит про-сцене — игроки могут завершать карьеру после одной победы:
Проблема с тем, что TI был настолько крупным турниром, заключалась в том, что в течение всего года больше ничего не имело значения.
Какой вообще смысл делать призовой фонд в $20 миллионов и заставлять игроков сразу завершать карьеру? Чем это хорошо для сц…
18 000 ммр первый в мире апнул Сатаник
Пора обнуляться
@cyber_2news
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cyber_2news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости киберспорта” (@cyber_2news), 1,855 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyber_2news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
