Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alex's Info

@cutestinfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003736298213
TypeChannel
Username@cutestinfo
Descriptionбог мистайпа @alexdarktriad
Created12 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/cutestinfo

Growth

505150.57 August 2026 — 51 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:3150no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:5450-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:3051first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 12 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
679.0%
avg views ÷ 50 subscribers
Avg views / post
340
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
60.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (12 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,395
Reactions total1,168
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,168 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521521147278685618923019.7%
custom 521564249852481647822919.6%
custom 521754201653094648822919.6%
custom 530995635109760824316814.4%
custom 521524622336725052815713.4%
custom 533931119843531540515513.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC55 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://t.me/alexstyping вступите в мой тгк где я выпускаю одни мистайпы пожалуйста😫😫😩🙏🙏

custom 52152462233672505286custom 53393111984353154054

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC405 views242 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 521521147278685618953custom 521754201653094648853custom 521564249852481647848custom 530995635109760824335custom 533931119843531540527custom 521524622336725052826

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC403 views241 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

☺️то вы для ☺️еня? 🎀

  1. ☺️анат 🤩42%
  2. ☺️юбите меня 💗12%
  3. ☺️учший друг😼5%
  4. ☺️руг 🎀2%
  5. ☺️накомый 🤩4%
  6. ☺️наете меня, но не общаемся 🎀19%
  7. ☺️отите пообщаться 🎀16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 521564249852481647851custom 521521147278685618947custom 521754201653094648844custom 521524622336725052838custom 530995635109760824331custom 533931119843531540530

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC364 views239 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩🎀аше мнение обо 🎀не 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🎀🤩🤩 🤍🤩🤩🤩🎀🎀🤩🤩🎀🎀🤩🎀🎀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Напишите под постом мнение, которое у вас сложилось обо мне🖤 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 521521147278685618953custom 521754201653094648850custom 521564249852481647844custom 521524622336725052835custom 530995635109760824329custom 533931119843531540528

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC361 views224 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✨🎁𝐿𝑢𝑣 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡🎀🎀 Adrian 🌟 Liza , Sofia, Nastya , Lina, Krissi, Jane, Sneja, Yan 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 521754201653094648850custom 530995635109760824346custom 521564249852481647843custom 521521147278685618934custom 533931119843531540526custom 521524622336725052825

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTC336 views212 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🪦🎀☺️ёша . ℎ𝑒/ℎ𝑖𝑚 17 y.o : 😱🎀 𝐼𝑆𝐹𝐽🌟🤩🌟𝑚𝑒𝑙- 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑔🌟 🍵🪦🎀🤩 🤩 🌟𝑠𝑜𝟿𝑤𝟷 𝟿𝟸𝟼🌟 𝐹𝐸𝐿𝑉🌟 🤩🏳 🎀🤩S𝐿𝑂𝐴𝑁🌟 Neutral-good🌟🤩🤩 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🤩dm : anon : тгк : DNI : мои тгк : kinns : fandoms 🤩🤩

custom 521521147278685618943custom 521564249852481647843custom 533931119843531540540custom 521754201653094648832custom 521524622336725052827custom 530995635109760824327

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @cutestinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 14:24 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

☺️то вы для ☺️еня? 🎀

  1. ☺️анат 🤩42%
  2. ☺️юбите меня 💗12%
  3. ☺️учший друг😼5%
  4. ☺️руг 🎀2%
  5. ☺️накомый 🤩4%
  6. ☺️наете меня, но не общаемся 🎀19%
  7. ☺️отите пообщаться 🎀16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,345 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex's Info” (@cutestinfo), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cutestinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.