Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Some H+

@cute_protons

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

421subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356561753
TypeChannel
Username@cute_protons
Descriptionpersonal proton and information exchange 转发可能只是传播迷因或未经证实的新闻,只有对转发的评论才代表频道煮观点
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cute_protons

Growth

4216 Aug 2026, 16:39 — 421 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 421 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:396 Aug 2026, 19:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:31421no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:39421first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.3%
avg views ÷ 421 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (8 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total4,105
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
783
Videos
6
Links
916

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC719 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/08/04/enabling-polonius-alpha-on-nighty/ 有生之年,泪目了

2 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC120 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://wangcong.org/2026-06-30-why-i-stopped-arguing-with-people.html

28 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC145 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @solidot

人类能在十周内学会回声定位 2026-07-28 18:33 by 绿光 回声定位是蝙蝠鲸鱼等动物导航寻路的一种方式。2021 年研究人员在《PLOS One》上发表论文称,盲人和视力正常的人都可以通过发出滴答声(clicks)学会回声定位。上个月研究人员在《Cerebral Cortex》期刊上发表了一项后续研究,称人类能在十周内学会回声定位。26 名参与者接受了 10 周的回声定位训练,研究人员调查了训练对其大脑结构的影响。研究团队分析了 V1(初级视觉皮层,负责处理视觉信息)和 A1(初级听觉皮层,负责处理声音信息)的脑部扫描图像。结果显示,盲人和视力正常的人的 V1 区域对声音回声的敏感性都得到了提升。这进一步证明,大脑的适应能力都很强。 https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae239 https://www.sciencealert.com/humans-can-echolocate

25 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC239 viewsread 6 August 2026

tldr: 我觉得就是 software implemented cherri runtime ,确实工作,但是作者极其厌恶 rust ,每几分钟就要嘲讽一下 rust 。 https://t.me/hacker_news_feed/130288

24 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC191 viewsread 6 August 2026

hn: your service uses free software, so you must serve me no matter what i've done and must never ban me. free as in usa!!! otherwise this is not free!!

20 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC191 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

renew https://m.cmx.im/@Thefirenextime/110886454856875414

17 Jul 2026, 22:49 UTC478 viewsread 6 August 2026

#暴论 很看不惯什么都换算成钱然后做加法的逻辑惯性:人是成本,时间是成本,智力也是成本,然后产出卖成钱减去成本算利润,最后线性规划最大化利润。资本主义入脑。且不说效益的衡量标准因人而异,更重要的是钱是一种资源但不是所有资源都是钱,也不是都像钱一样 fungible ,随意 homogeneous 地做加减法就非常荒谬。我甚至觉得很多成果和资源甚至不是可比的,尤其是思维理念上的东东。 有一点点想把我所有的因为「我觉得应该要存在」「我觉得如果存在会很好玩」而去做的仓库整理起来单独放一个 org 。我觉得我们臭写代码的都应该都有不少这种东西。

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cute_protons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 518,580 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Some H+” (@cute_protons), 421 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cute_protons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.