Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Проклятье II-го акта

@cursesecondact

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

222subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002627436796
TypeChannel
Username@cursesecondact
DescriptionИронично о муках сценарного творчества и не только... Автор канала Галаган Константин @GalaganKV
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cursesecondact

Growth

2227 Aug 2026, 16:41 — 222 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:32 — 222 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:418 Aug 2026, 10:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:32222no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:41222first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.5%
avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total395
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
12
Links
96

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
51s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4134.7%
3328.0%
😁2521.2%
👍1411.9%
👏21.69%
🥰21.69%
🤝10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC39 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лонгрид, про то как я чуть-чуть подрабатывал гангстером Часть 3. Если от покатушек я кое как отмазался, то посещение культурно-массовых мероприятий в злачных местах города, в частности в ночном клубе и казино "Фламинго", оставалось в силе. В основном я торчал у бара или на диванчике, тихо и спокойно набухивался текилой и нервно хихикал. Обычно мы были втроем со Славиком и Бегемотом. По пятницам и субботам к нам прис

🔥8👍2

22 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC99 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Штош, продакшн принял у нас драфт пилотной серии процедурала. Следующая остановка - продажа каналу. Не переключайтесь

🔥16👍3

17 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC135 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сценарист в естественной среде обитания за любимым делом.

😁43

15 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера был очередной удивительный вторник. Пришла обратная связь от креативного по моему проекту "Контактные лица". Если кратко: "Круто, но надо переписать". Обожаю.

😁43👍1

9 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC365 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лонгрид, про то как я чуть-чуть подрабатывал гангстером Часть 2. Гулянки и посиделки в компании Бегемота и Славика это было действительно весело. Тут надо сделать остановку и чуть подробнее остановиться кто же были Славик и Бегемот. Славик был классическим ботаником-дрищем. Очень разговорчивый, слегка суетливый. И он был действительно юристом, без пяти минут кандидатом юридических наук. Папа и мама у него были из ди

🔥6

8 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @script_clubPhoto

🤌В СкриптКлаб пройдут РАЗГОНЫ по мультсериалам Разбирать идеи будет Маша Черницына — креативный продюсер, сценарист и редактор анимации, сооснователь студии анимационного девелопмента «Мультипудель». Будем вместе смотреть, как задумка может превратиться в рабочий мультсериал. Что будем разбирать: — формат: вертикальный или горизонтальный — жанр и ЦА — движок сериала — тему: о чем эта история для зрителя — логлайн

8 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В нашем чудесном сообществе СкриптКлаб намечается крутое мероприятие. Если вы все еще раздумываете присоединиться ли к нашей секте этому чудесному сообществу, то это, возможно, знак.

1

6 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На исходе понедельника нас поджидает рубрика #душныйпонедельник И сегодня мы зафиналим нашу серию постов про процедуралы рассуждением на тему будущего процедуралов как жанра. На мой взгляд, "классический" процедурал устаревает. Да, эфирные каналы пока забиты ментами/врачами/адвокатами, но это одна и та же карусель, иногда с другими лошадками. И я не думаю, что в текущем виде это будет еще долго привлекать зрителя.

6

30 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC123 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лонгрид, про то как я чуть-чуть подрабатывал гангстером На дворе 1995. Я - студент-айтишник вечернего отделения политеха, что меня устраивало более чем, т.к. позволяло работать и подрабатывать. Ключевое слово для этой истории "подрабатывать". Мне предложили подработать "гангстером", а именно помочь подобрать и купить компьютер на фирму правильных пацанов. Сами они в этом не бум-бум, но раз у всех пацанов есть, то и

👍83🔥3🤝1

29 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вертикаль и горизонталь: сколько личной жизни нужно процедуралу У любого процедурала есть, минимум, два слоя. И если автор потеряет баланс и увлечется одним из них, то есть риск "перекоса". Первый слой — вертикаль. Это кейс серии. Он открывается в начале эпизода и закрывается в конце. Дело раскрыто, диагноз поставлен, иск разрешен. Зритель получает удовлетворение от завершенности. Второй слой — горизонталь. Это лич

25 Jun 2026, 06:51 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Это я, после трех часов созвона в авторской, делаю вид, что понял абсолютно все правки

😁7

24 Jun 2026, 08:54 UTC122 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Нейросреда радует рубрикой #нейроподкаст Сегодня подискутируем на тему: Почему злодей является злодеем. И поможет нам в этом книга К.Г. Юнга "Нераскрытая самость" Текст представляет собой обзор работ Карла Густава Юнга, посвященных анализу индивида в условиях массового общества. Автор исследует угрозу поглощения личности государственным абсолютизмом и массовой психологией, подчеркивая, что истинная реальность сосре

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cursesecondact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 677,570 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проклятье II-го акта” (@cursesecondact), 222 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cursesecondact.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.