Channel
@curiousnotjudgemental
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002969253992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curiousnotjudgemental |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curiousnotjudgemental |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 104 | +12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 92 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:08 | 84 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 83 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 83 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
84 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 16.7% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 14.3% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4 часа ночи. Сижу, пазл собираю. Вдруг слышу хлопки на балконе. Подхожу — а там отсвет огня 🔥 И я такая: опять?!! Разбудила Андрея, увела собаку. На этот раз у нас был огнетушитель, справились быстро🧯 Спасибо @rsluchevskiy за полезный блин подарок 🤪 Розетка загорелась. Походу, плохая была. Предохранитель вылетел, так что больше ничего не пострадало. Порошком разве что от огнетушителя весь балкон засыпало, включая м…
👀7😱6
Приехали в Палеопарк Путилово и набрали 20кг камней 😂 То что это ил моря, которое на этом месте было 400млн лет назад осмысляется с трудом 😬 Ну как вообще можно представить такую цифру. Динозавры были давно, а трилобиты ОЧЕНЬ давно, или как? 💁♀️ Приключение классное. Процесс реально увлекательный. Почти в каждом крупном куске что-то да есть. Азартно! Находки опубликую в комментарии 🪨 Я первый час просто пыталась …
🔥5❤3😱1
Сегодня на утренней прогулке я узнала, что если сесть на землю и со всех сторон облепиться собаками, можно на некоторое время почувствовать себя очень счастливой 🥰😃🐕 #шабака
🥰9❤5😍3
И вот я такая думаю: 45 фиалок чот ту мач 🤔 Надо уменьшить. На Авито бесплатно отдавать задолбаешься, там на бесплатное куча неадеквата приходит всегда. Просто оставить внизу у лифта стремно — вдруг пропадут 😬 И я придумала гениальную тему: находить на Авито предложения по цветам, которые мне нравятся, и предлагать обмен 3 к 1 🌸 Три моих фиалки за условный филодендрон. Типа многие любят обмениваться, а я уменьшу общ…
🤣12🍾4😁1
Когда цветут растения, которые обычно этого не делают, всегда радостно 🤗 А тут вообще кактус зацвел 🤩 Уииии! 🥰 #greenhome
❤10🔥4🎄1🥰1😍1
Довольно странное получается лето в плане досуга 🌻 Ну первое лето с собакой, эт понятно. Прогулки каждый день. Изучаю полевые цветы и чем отличается осот от кульбабы 🌼😄 Внезапно, у нас цикорий прям около дома растет 😳 Вот это синенькое — он 🌿 Первое полноценное лето дома после пожара. Как новая жизнь. Ремонт не закончили, но уже и так нормально, вполне уютно. Цветы пришли в себя, и их количество, оказалось, удвоило…
❤6🔥5
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @curiousnotjudgemental. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Be curious — керамика и жизнь” (@curiousnotjudgemental), 104 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curiousnotjudgemental.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.