Channel
@curd_pongo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
107subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002290285775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curd_pongo |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curd_pongo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 107 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 108 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 108 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (21 May 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 894 |
| Reactions total | 136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
348 reactions across 16 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5305691534472005873 | 54 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5283160221936550463 | 37 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5251561121042680892 | 32 | 9.20% | |
| custom 6089088191963338703 | 24 | 6.90% | |
| custom 6089423963916606569 | 21 | 6.03% | |
| custom 5235840119105163913 | 18 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5251249985021822769 | 17 | 4.89% | |
| custom 5332582947482513634 | 16 | 4.60% | |
| custom 5431749945596085331 | 16 | 4.60% | |
| custom 5251546097247079404 | 15 | 4.31% | |
| custom 5327894135980444462 | 14 | 4.02% | |
| custom 5238073871466270410 | 13 | 3.74% | |
| custom 5332485254156398745 | 13 | 3.74% | |
| custom 5204272680710200518 | 11 | 3.16% | |
| custom 5206387239138907825 | 10 | 2.87% | |
| custom 5204192291807320315 | 8 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5334899399438903554 | 8 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5208918082977813025 | 5 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5238039928339728727 | 5 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5206446221924785554 | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 4 further kinds | 7 | 2.01% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In the jungle, the mighty jungle The lion sleeps tonight In the jungle, the quiet jungle The lion sleeps tonight
custom 60890881919633387036custom 60894239639166065696custom 53056915344720058734custom 52538175422411723081custom 53842701859453839751
я такая тупая блин класс не заметила как напилась и никто не узнает про нас иди ко мне прямо сейчас
custom 530569153447200587312custom 60890881919633387037custom 60894239639166065696custom 53324852541563987451
это реквест для этого человечка. балуюсь с безлайном, не судите да не судимы будете хз ⭐
custom 530569153447200587310custom 60890881919633387036custom 60894239639166065694
ну я типа на приколе типа аа.. короче это гифт для этой леди 💚 抱きしめた 君の 華奢な未来は 儚く 壊れそうで 綺麗さ 何もかも 投げ出したっていいから この手で 守るから честно говоря, я в замешательстве, что вставать по тексту... значит будет текст моего любимого аниме эндинга 🤩
custom 530569153447200587310custom 60894239639166065695custom 53278941359804444623custom 60890881919633387032🙏1custom 52492431529628310061
хочу разртсоваться, по этому нарисую ну 1 мб 2 реквеста, ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО для ферал котов. При условии, что вы, если получите реквест, репостните его на свой канал Если не получите - не репостите ТОЛЬКО КОТЫ.
custom 53324852541563987455custom 60890881919633387033custom 53842701859453839751
вообще, лучший подарок это деньги, но я считаю, что репост был бы тоже очень приятным и милым подарком от вас ⭐
custom 53056915344720058738custom 53324852541563987455custom 53278941359804444623custom 53348993994389035542custom 52538175422411723081custom 53325829474825136341
у меня сегодня день рождения, мне исполняется 21 год ⭐ но я чувствую себя на все 10 ⭐
custom 530569153447200587310custom 53278941359804444624custom 53325829474825136343custom 53348993994389035543custom 53324852541563987451
а да, трейд с этим человеком. Я не знаю кто он ... Но было прикольно 🍉
custom 533258294748251363412custom 53278941359804444624custom 53348993994389035543custom 53324852541563987451custom 53842701859453839751
Somewhere beyond the moon Somewhere beyond the moon Somewhere beyond the moon So high, so high, so high Let me run away No word to ground control ‘Cause I wanna stay Somewhere higher than the moon On the day I’m heaven bound I ain’t ever coming down I wanna play Somewhere higher than the moon Farewell, wicked earth So long, skies of blue Hello, universe Somewhere beyond the moon
custom 543174994559608533110custom 52831602219365504638custom 52380738714662704107custom 52358401191051639131custom 52515611210426808921
⠀ ведь при коммунизме всё будет заебись
custom 52515611210426808927custom 52512499850218227696custom 54317499455960853314custom 52380399283397287272custom 52380738714662704102custom 52515460972470794042custom 52358401191051639131custom 52831602219365504631
now i'm home, but i cannot stay i dream of you every day got to know every inch of you will you make my dream come true there’s no place like home they say you’my home, so hear me pray
custom 52831602219365504639custom 52515611210426808928custom 52515460972470794044custom 52358401191051639133custom 52380399283397287271custom 52512499850218227691
Я хочу и я буду мечтать В прошлом времени побывать И с тобою засыпать Под шелест кинопленки
custom 528316022193655046311custom 525124998502182276910custom 52515460972470794045custom 52358401191051639132custom 54317499455960853312custom 52380399283397287271custom 52515611210426808921
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @curd_pongo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 340,281 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@curd_pongo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Понго” (@curd_pongo), 107 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curd_pongo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.