Channel
@curagai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003059843321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curagai |
| Created | 22 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curagai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 30 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 31 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 31 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 31 | 52.5% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5296761442765127357 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5235829712399399652 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5363896969922105025 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5433767609562578028 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.69% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А мы ведь всего лишь хотели на 96 часов исчезнуть в киберпространстве между сентябрём и октябрём. Но это пространство оказалось кротовой норой, где время перерабатывает тебя быстрее, чем миджорни успевает сгенерировать очередную картинку в режиме fast Нырнули мы туда в конце сентября, а вынырнули почему-то в начале декабря, и в руках у нас оказалась бронза международного конкурса myfilm48, а в голове чувство, что ре…
🔥6🎉2👍2
А вот и бэкстейдж самих съемок!
🔥8👍2🤝1
Мы сгенерировали зомби-апокалипсис, чтобы вы могли вовремя заказать Атаракс. Свершилось! 🧟♂️💊 Мы наконец можем рассказать о создании ролика для аптечного сервиса UTEKA. Включайте скорее заглавную тему из фильма Halloween (1978), загибайте свои лишние пальцы на фактах и танцуйте вместе с нашими великолепными актерами массовки! БЭКСТЕЙДЖ В ЦИФРАХ: Энергозатраты: Этот зомби-апокалипсис стоил нашей команде >500 г…
🔥7❤3🎉1
Мы конечно не хвастаемся (хвастаемся), но у нас в команде не только эксперты, но ещё и пророки Второе место в конкурсе SPLAT x tamers действительно случилось ❤️
🔥7
Привет! Новости такие: • приняли участие в ещё одном конкурсе нейровидео tamers • сделали asmr-ролик с пастой SPLAT • вышли в топ-20 (так тебе, кариес!) за звук отвечал l4rtsfx, а мы не можем ответить себе на вопрос, какое из двух видео лучше, так что помогайте ✨ 🔥 — первое сочное ❤️ — второе мурашевое
❤4🔥3
всем привет!
custom 52967614427651273573custom 54337676095625780281
нейротипографика — круто генерить тексты можно абсолютно по разному. если на руках ваших проектов нет гайдов, купленных шрифтов или есть желание поэкспериментировать — рассказываем как сделать это классно для недавнего проекта мы генерировали типографику через ChatGPT и нам понравилось. рассчитываем, что понравится и вам how to • подбираем серию подходящих референсов (не только гарнитуры, но еще и какие-нибудь кле…
custom 52358297123993996522custom 52967614427651273572custom 53638969699221050252😎1custom 54337676095625780281
взяли четвертое место. ЗАВЕРШЕНО
пока пятничный вайбик
🙊1
здесь будет пост-знакомство когда мы окончательно обретем самосознание
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @curagai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 578,863 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Куражай | ai продакшн” (@curagai), 30 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curagai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.