4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,559–1,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:15
1,573
+3
12 Aug 2026, 17:44
1,570
+9
6 Aug 2026, 07:34
1,561
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:32
1,561
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 1,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
380
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
16 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
6,074
Reactions total
412
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
210 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
47.1%
🔥
52
24.8%
😁
25
11.9%
custom 5249484362621141855
15
7.14%
custom 5458764448074312646
11
5.24%
😍
7
3.33%
💔
1
0.476%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.25%
1 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
506
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
380
over 15 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGqKWSM
1
22 July 2026
22 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Выпуск №70, рубрики #лучшепочитаю
Мы привыкли думать, что «увидеть мир» — это обязательно про горизонты, билеты на самолет и восторг открывающихся видов. Но есть и другая оптика. Что, если мир — это не тот, кто ждет тебя за порогом, а тот, кто настигает тебя, когда ты меньше всего готов? Эта подборка именно о таком приключении: о том, как география превращается в испытание, а перемена места оборачивается переменой с…
Восставший из ада, Клайв Баркер
Сперва не планировала писать об этой повести, едва ли я скажу что-то новое ценителям жанра. Но тут муж спросил «а про что там?», и я подумала: а почему бы мне не сделать наоборот? Пост для тех, кто не в теме, который маленько расскажет, почему это культовая в своем роде вещь.
По сюжету охотник за удовольствиями и мелкий преступник Фрэнк открывает дверь в иное измерение с помощью зага…
Слушаю «Нейроманта» Уильяма Гибсона (потому что скоро сериал и вообще классика киберпанка).
Дочитываю в бумаге «Восставший из ада» и хочу до самолета (завтра) успеть ещё «Ночной народ» того же Клайва Баркера.
В электронке мечусь между «Отцом Серёжей» Марины Чуфистовой и «777» Кирилла Рябова – надкусила обе по чуть-чуть, надо выбрать, что дочитать первым…
У вас что?
Невероятное путешествие, Шейла Барнфорд
В этом году я прочла немало детских книг, но писать о них здесь мне не интересно. Исключение – эта история, потому что согласиться с маркировкой 6+ никак не могу – своему сыну я бы предложила её лет в 12. А пока с огромным удовольствием прочла сама.
Невероятное путешествие по суровым канадским лесам совершают молодой лабрадор, пожилой бультерьер и дерзкий сиамский кот. Они пу…
Что читает мать, пока ребенок спит 😅
На самом деле книга с первых страниц осыпает читателя умными словечками, чего я от неё на ждала (да, ваша любительница хоррора только сейчас закрывает читательский пробел на месте Баркера).
Я подумала, что в это воскресенье стоит и вас ошеломить умным и полезным контентом.
Итак, в начале повести «Восставший из ада» главный герой Фрэнк пытается открыть таинственную шкатулку Лема…
Претендент на книгу года (для меня): «Улица Яффо», Даниэль Шпек
Давно не каталась на таких эмоциональных качелях, скажу я вам.
Это семейная сага в историческом контексте XX века, события первой книги «Piccola Сицилия» разворачиваются в Тунисе во время Второй Мировой, а «Улица Яффо» рассказывает о людях и семьях в период создания государства Израиль (1948). И как же это больно!
В «Piccola Сицилия» всё крутится вокр…
Голова на серебряном блюде, Содзи Симада
Не откладывая в долгий ящик, взялась за следующий роман из серии про японского сыщика Киёси Митараи и снова недовольна.
В этой части автор решил повторить успешную формулу «Хрустальной пирамиды», смешав сразу несколько популярных тем в предыстории к преступлению, но второй раз шалость не удалась. В итоге первые 25% книги занимает история кровожадной Элизабет Батори, которая …
Пока в комментариях ностальгируем по Алтаю, напомню: 10–16 августа туда всё ещё можно успеть. Маршрут уже собран, отели найдены, ещё и накормят.
А осенью — Камчатка, Китай, Марокко и ЮАР.
Куда, когда и сколько — в канале Gelios Travel.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @culturehedonism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 46,807 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Винишко под книжку 📚🍷” (@culturehedonism), 1,573 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/culturehedonism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
