🤍 Я про вас не забыла, просто в запое и думаю какой мв сделать.. ДОГ У МЕНЯ ПО ВИНЕ ПОДАРКУ Fairy Nat NEW LPS 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 t.me/cultdau
❤🔥5🤯3💯2

Channel
@cultdau
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003791852612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cultdau |
| Description | link : https://t.me/+ZJH3HoSPpDplYjli ВЫПУСКАЮСЬ НА АНГЛ АУДИТОРИЮ, здесь перезаливы и анонсы, персонажи ! |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 26 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cultdau |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 17 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
53 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5339018994630285477 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5307521143295480105 | 5 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5357279468996029321 | 5 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5217958851696954525 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5332396966808682611 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5334825959793112459 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5415935038493596456 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5309863635638586109 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| custom 5335043255073518714 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| custom 5456402211766557835 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.77% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤍 Я про вас не забыла, просто в запое и думаю какой мв сделать.. ДОГ У МЕНЯ ПО ВИНЕ ПОДАРКУ Fairy Nat NEW LPS 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 t.me/cultdau
❤🔥5🤯3💯2
я и кто? 🍎 t.me/cultdau |#devotion
custom 53348259597931124591custom 54564022117665578351
🍫👻SKELETON COLLECTION 👻🎁 👻👻👻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👻🤩в скелетон колекшен фотографии тех моделей (в частности и просто работников) которые сомневаются в себе. Эти фотографии могут показать в них уверенность. Я надеюсь, что эта уверенность в будущем у них и появится — автор альбома фотографий SK, Мишель 1/??? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 модель - Моника фотограф - Хайвен редактор - Мишель 🌟🌟🌟 снизу будут еще постики! Как вам?🤩🤩залив в инст попозже. 🍎 t.me/c…
custom 53075211432954801055🕊3custom 52179588516969545253custom 53098636356385861092custom 54564022117665578351
Sticker, posted without a caption
🃏Премия лпсников открыла форму для голосования! будем крайне рады вашим голосам!!!! · DARK PARADISE в сериале года · mv DREAMCORE в клип года · ЮРИЭЛЬ и ЖЕННИЭЛЬ в народной номинации ВСЕМ УСПЕХОВ В ГОЛОСОВАНИИ!
Sticker, posted without a caption
с первомаем 💋
LPS • CULTIST’S DAUGHTER pinned a photo
💋
💋💋💋🎀добро пожаловать в 💋💋💋 🎀🎀портал 💋💋💋💋 красных глаз. 🚫 💋💋💋 🎀🎀🎀🎀💋✉️✉️💋 💋Неճօльшая навиɾацմя 😀😀link-переходник t.me/cultists_daughter ← в канал БЕЗУМИЯ И КРАСНЫХ ГЛАЗ 💋💋💋💋 💋💋💋💋 Меня зовут cultist’s daughter, что в переводе «дочь культиста», my маскот 664 с именем Элизабет. 💋 ➕Выпускаюсь вообще на англ аудиторию, а в тг перезаливы и анонсы (для тех, кому это интересно). Клепаю MV и собираю коллекцию. 😻🎀 У меня е…
custom 53348259597931124592custom 53350432550735187142custom 53390189946302854772custom 53572794689960293212custom 53323969668086826111
██████████ 100%
▰▰▰▰▰▱▱▱▱▱ 50%
custom 53390189946302854772
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cultdau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 956,028 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cultdau named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LPS • CULTIST’S DAUGHTER” (@cultdau), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cultdau.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.