Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психология культа

@cultchanel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

328subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002906373030
TypeChannel
Username@cultchanel
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cultchanel

Growth

2983283136 August 2026 — 298 subscribers6 August 2026 — 298 subscribers13 August 2026 — 328 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 294–333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:16328+30
6 Aug 2026, 22:33298no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:02298first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7431.6%
custom 54205116353851163064720.1%
🕊4519.2%
💔4117.5%
custom 5195155556062482434145.98%
🙏104.27%
😢31.28%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pure_cognitionsPhoto

Как люди попадают в культы: история актрисы из «Игры престолов» Почему даже преуспевающие люди попадают в секты? И можно ли от этого уберечься? В новой статье рассказываем об истории Ханны Мюррей — актрисы, известной по сериалам «Молокососы» и «Игра престолов». В 2026 году Ханна выпустила книгу о том, как попала в культ, и о том, как впоследствии это привело её к психозу и принудительной госпитализации. ➡️ Читать

5😢2💔1

6 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC173 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pure_cognitions

Прямой эфир «Культы и секты. Как вовремя распознать опасность?» ➡️ 9 июля в 18:00 (МСК) на ютуб-канале Дневник ЧК ➡️ Ссылка на эфир О культах и сектах говорят много, но достоверного психопросвещения по-прежнему не хватает. Популярный в массовой культуре образ секты — изолированная община, люди в капюшонах и странные ритуалы. Но в реальности деструктивные группы не так экзотичны, и могут оказаться гораздо ближе к на

8🕊1🙏1

2 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC261 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Лекции про секты и культы — быть! Оказалось, что очень многим людям хочется узнать больше про культы и секты. Поэтому 9го июля, в 18.00 по мск мы совместно с Чистыми когнициями проведем большой открытый эфир. Поговорим о том, чем культ отличается от секты, как понять, что группа опасна и деструктивна и можно ли помочь близким выйти из секты. Эфир будет полезен всем — и людям, кто просто интересуется темой, и тем, ч

10🕊2🙏1

29 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC258 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @act_cft_amsterdaryaPoll

Хотите?

  1. Хочуу!71%
  2. Неактуально13%
  3. Тык16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC354 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему деятельность культов и сект долго остается безнаказанной? Отвечаем на вопросы из комментариев В комментариях мы получили вопрос: «Почему секты долго никто не замечает? Ничего не могут сделать, пока всё не дойдёт до экстремальной массовой уголовщины?» Действительно, многие тоталитарные группы могут долго оставаться незамеченными государством, пока не случится какого-то громкого преступления, как было, наприме

custom 519515555606248243498🙏4

23 May 2026, 13:34 UTC320 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики, привет! Скажите, а что вам было бы интересно узнать о культах и сектах? Может, вы слышали какие-то популярные идеи и хотите узнать, правда ли это? Накидайте, пожалуйста, своих вопросов — а мы сделаем на неделе пост с ответами 🩶 Ps спасибо, вы лучшие! Ждите постов! ✨

7custom 51951555560624824345

14 May 2026, 08:27 UTC398 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привязанность и диссоциация в деструктивном культе Есть распространенный миф о том, что в секты и культы попадают люди с ненадежной привязанностью. О том, почему это не так и кто на самом деле попадает в культ, мы писали в этом посте. А сегодня поговорим о том, что вообще происходит с привязанностью в культе и как возникает диссоциация — мощный механизм, позволяющий человеку долго оставаться в опасных условиях. Пр

18💔5😢1

20 Apr 2026, 15:14 UTC416 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

➡️ Абьюзивные отношения ➡️ Секта, культ или другая деструктивная группа ➡️ Тоталитарное государство — что между этими явлениями общего? Не поленитесь, подумайте, зайдите в комментарии и ответьте, не читая дальше. Потом возвращайтесь к тексту ⤵️ Ядро всех этих явлений — отношения, в которых есть контроль и власть только у одной стороны. И эта сторона — не вы (если вы, конечно, не Бог Кузя, Пол Пот или человек, сове

18🕊7💔3

16 Apr 2026, 11:17 UTC473 views94 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Бывший член Церкви саентологии — о е-метре, исповеди и побеге из культа во время ковида В марте этого года к нам в канал пришел молодой мужчина, который с самого детства рос в секте саентологов. Он рассказал нам свою историю. В карточках — цитаты из нашего с ним интервью, а весь текст можно прочитать по ссылке. Автор поста: Дарья Смородина, АСТ-психологиня Пожалуйста, поддержите наш проект реакциями, комментариями

custom 542051163538511630642💔32🕊20

1 Apr 2026, 11:55 UTC511 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как сохранить в себе человека в тоталитаризме? Культы и тоталитарные политические режимы очень схожи: они тотально контролируют человека и разрушают его личность. Год назад я написала большую статью про то, как остаться человеком в условиях тоталитарной системы. Эта статья спустя время стала только актуальнее, поэтому я сделала красивые карточки по ней 🖤 В карточках использованы фотографии узников ГУЛАГа, я взяла

🕊15custom 54205116353851163065🙏4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @cultchanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

Хотите?

  1. Хочуу!71%
  2. Неактуально13%
  3. Тык16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 13 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,601 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психология культа” (@cultchanel), 328 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cultchanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.