Channel
@cuconvocation2023
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001856849232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cuconvocation2023 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 25 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cuconvocation2023 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 151 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 151 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
50 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 90.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2023 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最後6️⃣日 一傳十 十傳百🗣️ 緊急呼籲⚠️ 拜托各位中大人🙏🏻 中大校董選舉9月16日前登記做選民 https://council-election-convo.cuhk.edu.hk/emailverification/ 眾所周知，中大建制（現時校董會+大灣區校友會人）為咗保自己人選到，一直無理(甚至違法：尚在進行司法覆核程序）DQ中大人參選。或許我哋做嘅改變唔到咩大局，但我哋作為中大人深信我哋係唔應該硬食。我哋希望號召足夠人數嘅中大人，用最簡單嘅方法向中大建制說不✋🏻 我哋知道唔少中大人已經登記咗，但係人數上尚未足夠，要知道對家係動員緊一群校友會同深圳中大一車車票咁倒落嚟。我哋現在懇切拜托各位中大人幫手廣傳出去，如果你見到有中大人group係未有呢個訊息，我哋想請你幫手forward呢個訊息。 ⚠️ 愈少人登記，指定候選人們就愈高得票率，就愈「眾望所歸」。 ⚠️ 指定候選人們需要至少10%登記選民或一千人投票先至有…
👍1
重要消息：如果有在港嘅中大校友有意參選或願意提名人參選，請從速聯絡我哋！ 我哋最近留意到中大校友校董一席選舉已經喺到鬼崇咁進行。首先，所謂「選舉公告」只係上載咗喺一個唔知喺邊到先㩒到入去嘅一個中大網站。即使我哋仍每隔一兩日就會收到大學俾校友嘅電郵，冇一封係關於呢件事，可見中大管理層認為一般校友係唔需要知道呢件事。此舉明顯係唔想俾一般校友參選，甚至我哋相信大學已經「內定」咗人選。 唔單止冇正常公佈，幾經辛苦㩒到入去，我哋會見到呢個「選舉」有諸多限制，例如要喺兩星期時間要30個提名嘅實體簽署參選表格，喺大學辦公時間親身交表。呢啲舉動明顯只有一個目的：就係唔俾唔係「自己人」參選。 更甚，呢個選舉（學生、教職員校董選舉都係）同今時今日香港特式民主一樣，當然係有篩選嘅環節，確保入閘嘅人一定要啱佢哋心水。選舉規則佢話：「[Election Committees] shall submit assessment reports to […
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
總結：一埋爛橙中比較冇咁爛
https://www.instagram.com/p/DAZvxtbBdvN/?igsh=ZXhjYXQ2bGl3eWV3
https://www.instagram.com/p/DATinyqhrA4/?igsh=aGptYWwzeTdub216
《就遴選委員會提名盧煜明教授出任中大校長聲明》 中大校方於今日（9月23日）向全體校友、同學及教職員公布，校長遴選委員會已向校董會提名現任中大醫學院副院長盧煜明教授為下任中大校長，並定於本星期四（9月26日）下午3時至8時30分舉行交流會（校友時段為下午7時至8時30分）。 盧教授是資深的中大老師，亦是傑出的研究學者，醫學研究上貢獻良多。他於1997年加入中大成為中大人，至今已經有27年之久。他也是善衡書院的成員。 我們一直以來均認為委任一校之長茲事體大，必須充份諮詢各持份者，即全體中大人的意見。我們欣喜校方仍遵循過往中大的一貫做法，在校董會正式通過任命前先舉行交流會，讓中大人能當面親身與（唯一）候選人溝通和互相了解。 要求舉行更多交流會和開放視象交流會 然而，據了解中大校董會計劃於本星期五（9月27日）會議上通過委任，我們認為時間過於倉猝，未免令交流會給人一個「走程序」的觀感，只流於表面和形式。我們建議遴選委員會應舉…
❤1
相信大家都知，但都想提醒吓大家，原定於今個星期六（8月19日）舉行嘅會員大會被延期。暫時未知幾時會再搞。
👍3
【衛我山城 最後今日】 ‼️今日下晝5點截止投票‼️ 抱歉再打搞大家🙏🏻 我哋懇請各位幫個忙，1️⃣ 電子投票畀我哋嘅候選人李梓龍 Alvin，2️⃣ 行多一步share叫多一個中大人投票🙇♂️ 選情比我哋想像中嚴峻，公眾反映亦比我哋預想低。今日，我哋更發覺原來常委會已經偷偷地走後門咁開咗畀中大(深圳)嘅畢業生投票，而且，佢哋已經喺牆內動員數以千計嘅中大(深圳)畢業生去支持另一位候選人何啟德大灣區律師。 中大(深圳)畢業生喺牆內動員支持何啟德正正就係因為我哋其中一項政綱：界限分明，保障本校學位價值，全力反對中大(深圳)與本校合併國際排名、反對中大(深圳)畢業生獲得本校學位和取得與本校相同設計的畢業證書、要求校董會確保兩校畢業證書必須有明確分別等。 恐怕若何啟德當選，除咗會修章令DQ候選人變得合法、剝奪校友召開會員大會、出席權、提案權同投票權外，更嚴峻嘅係會讓佢可以有機會以校友校董嘅身份，支持中大同中大(深圳)融合嘅措施。…
❤1👍1
【最後一週 重奪評議會 】拜託大家叫齊中大同窗投票🙏🏿 海外校友都可以‼️ 【選情告急】常委會已多次DQ候選人，令至少三席由大灣區校友會自動當選。另一主席候選人、大灣區律師何啟德已獲現屆常委喺社交群組大量動員支持 ‼️ 被DQ候選人孫昊賢、謝煒洛同戴安緊急呼籲：票投李梓龍！支持Alvin成為校友評議會主席！‼️ 🐲 李梓龍 Alvin，前中大學生會成員，佢嘅參選理念就係【衛我山城 還政中大人】 若佢有幸當選主席，會利用佢校友校董身份，增加校政透明度，使校友得知學校近況；同時與海內外校友保持溝通，將大家對中大嘅聲音直係反映畀中大管理層。佢相信校友評議會主席位置，唔係畀人攞嚟圍威喂、謀私利嘅工具。 【‼️截止投票11/8 5PM‼️】 1️⃣ 立即Click入👇🏿 cuhkconvocation.redso.com.hk 2️⃣ 用@link (1155xxxxx) 登入 3️⃣ 登記「出席」+電子投票 - 無論出席與否都…
👍1
Channel name was changed to «CU Convocation AGM 2023»
https://www.instagram.com/p/CvO0knih2ti/?igshid=NjZiM2M3MzIxNA==
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cuconvocation2023. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 339,741 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CU Convocation AGM 2023” (@cuconvocation2023), 151 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cuconvocation2023.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.