Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for cthulhumakeup

Channel

cthulhumakeup

@cthulhumakeup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

424subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073604813
TypeChannel
Username@cthulhumakeup
Created29 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cthulhumakeup

Growth

423424423.55 August 2026 — 423 subscribers6 August 2026 — 423 subscribers14 August 2026 — 424 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 423–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:34424+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:31423no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:34423first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.2%
avg views ÷ 424 subscribers
Avg views / post
209
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,460
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16045.8%
😁4813.8%
🔥349.74%
💔267.45%
🙏133.72%
👀123.44%
🙉113.15%
❤‍🔥92.58%
😢82.29%
💯61.72%
🥰51.43%
👏41.15%
💋41.15%
🌚30.86%
🦄30.86%
🤔20.573%
👌10.287%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC109 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Фрагмент из видоса Вог про дом Мадонны. Oyedo, Fracas (любимый парфюм ее мамы, по ее словам, который она хранит, чтобы всегда чувствовать маму рядом), Crystal Saffron, Portrait of a Lady. Но не на полке, а над столиком у нее стоит классическая пятерка, edp. Интересно, но ни одного парфюма, которые она делала или рекламировала сама, я не вижу))

5🥰5❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 00:41 UTC220 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В моей любимой видеоигре Vampire: The Masquerade — Bloodlines есть не то, чтобы мем, а постмодернистский кивок. Побочный персонаж, который в целом вообще никому не всрался и на сюжет не влияет, говорит: "Неважно, выиграете вы эту игру или проиграете... Главное, что вы ее купили". Сорчинелли настолько сильно подходит к тому, чтобы тоже произнести это вслух, насколько вообще возможно. Выпускает суп из семи залуп в кит

😁72

29 Jul 2026, 23:55 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Люблю всё-таки точность характеристик. Как хорошо говорит об образе, который создает герой, этот флакон rabanne one million 🤣🤣🤣

😁5

21 Jul 2026, 23:06 UTC293 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А вот этот господин, несомненно, остается. Душа моя просит света и легкой печали, а их я чувствую благодаря легкому ирисовому колоню — Iris Suprema от португальского бренда Benamôr (Саша, спасибо за подарок!) Грустный корень ириса, лаванда и меланхоличная фиалка мелькают, как пушинки пыли в солнечном столбе, в мягкой цитрусовой подложке, с которой которой Iris Suprema стартует. Но цитрусовое сияние быстро сменяется

18🔥1🙏1

20 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC228 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Так как советов пока нет, представляю первого кандидата на выбывание — Promise Ропьона. Я помню, как сильно он мне понравился в самом начале. Дымные тона, яблоко, пряности, перец, животиночка — все в лучших традициях моих парфюмерных вкусов. Но за несколько лет, что он стоит на полке, я израсходовала дай боже 3 миллилитра из 50, а все почему? Потому, что он зудящий, сухой и горячий для меня, как пустынный ветер. Мо

4🙏3💋1😁1

19 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC211 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Написанному верить: Gold Fair in Mayfair продержался на мне добрых десять часов. Нанесла его вечером, а утром все еще чувствовала его, сидящего близко к коже и уютного. На старте обещают абсент, но я его вообще не чувствую: есть только мягкая травяная нота, которая не шибает в нос злой полынью. Возможно, это шалфей, но выделить его сложно. Первую скрипку играет какао: от него запах становится теплее и гуще; а акком

15💯3🙏1

19 Jul 2026, 01:00 UTC210 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

называется, меня заинтересовал еще один аромат...

😁12🦄31💯1

20 Jun 2026, 02:10 UTC≈1,090 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Внезапно заскучала по обмененному когда-то Rouge CdG, наверное, в рамках тоски по родине. Кто же знал тогда, что борщ, ладан и имбирь будут указывать в сторону дома! Второго дома; не столько буржуазной накокаиненной Москвы, сколько в сторону грибного Питера. Пачули в подворотнях; клумбы Марсова поля; влажность рек и каналов; морская соль и щиплющий оттенок имбиря прямо в носу. Свекла и ее острый, немного ржавый зап

23🙏4💋3

6 Jun 2026, 16:50 UTC456 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ЛАДНО. (ФК Црвена звезда это наш главный клуб да)

8🔥6😁5

24 May 2026, 01:02 UTC482 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На райские Балканы наступает, хохоча, безжалостное лето, которое будет жарить нас до черной корочки на солнечном роштиле. Это плохо. Но наступает и сезон овощей, фруктов, всего свежего и прекрасного. Это хорошо. По ночам на улице одуряюще пахнет чубушник, мне аж захотелось политься лашевским Lust комплементарно, а на кухне у меня стоит корзинка несъедобных совсем еще нектарин. Но боже, какой у них аромат! От помидор

19❤‍🔥4🙏2

20 May 2026, 15:31 UTC429 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну что же, это должно было случиться. Полезла вчера вытащить флакон с заднего ряда заставленной полочки, зацепила два других и их уронила. Один разбился. Спасибо тебе, Лаванда Ле Лабо! Я буду скучать. Еще одно спасибо, кстати, за то, что от удара у флакона аккуратно отделилось донышко, так что он разбился без осколков. Это было очень ценно. В доме теперь пахнет финальным (как раз лавандовым) аккордом парфюма. Кажды

💔26😢83🌚3🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cthulhumakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,584 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“cthulhumakeup” (@cthulhumakeup), 424 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cthulhumakeup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.