Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CT40 documental 🎥 Canal

Channel

CT40 documental 🎥 Canal

@ct40doc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

457subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349951300
TypeChannel
Username@ct40doc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ct40doc

Growth

456457456.57 August 2026 — 457 subscribers8 August 2026 — 457 subscribers14 August 2026 — 456 subscribers21 August 2026 — 457 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 456–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 08:43457+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:25456-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:50457no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:38457first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 09s
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1728.3%
🔥1321.7%
1220.0%
😡46.67%
👏35.00%
🤣35.00%
23.33%
23.33%
🙏23.33%
🤯11.67%
🥰11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👏21🤯1

29 Jul 2026, 02:12 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3mgLgCr0FmU?si=7RQLeibeNC2CrAf2

21🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

¿Cuantas ilegalidades caben en este medida? ¿Vamos a seguir mirando la pantalla mientras todo pasa? Ministro Negro: “Se instalarán 27 arcos digitales en el ingreso a Montevideo para captar rostros, matrículas y celulares" - Radio Sarandí 690 AM :Radio Sarandí 690 AM https://www.sarandi690.com.uy/2026/03/27/ministro-negro-se-instalaran-27-arcos-digitales-en-el-ingreso-a-montevideo-para-captar-rostros-matriculas-y-cel

👍2🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/chy_OocVVmo?si=eSsG3xDc6p7WvZFS

1🙏1

26 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LibertadSanitariaUyPhoto

¿Otro título falso? Al verificar un dato en el registro oficial del MSP, ¡vaya sorpresa!, encontramos una irregularidad inesperada. La documentamos, la hicimos pública, nos cuestionaron y presentamos un pedido de acceso a la información. Horas después, el registro fue modificado. ¿Qué decía antes? ¿Qué cambió? ¿Por qué el MSP actuó con tanta rapidez? En este informe presentamos la cronología completa, con la evide

24 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @canaljorgeguerra

https://www.youtube.com/live/FC7jKT1kcsk?si=FNx6G7oSIHp1_oqd

11

24 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LibertadSanitariaUyPhoto

¿Te están contando toda la verdad sobre la meningitis y sus vacunas? Mientras los titulares hablan de niños fallecidos por meningitis no vacunados, nadie menciona los casos de vacunados que también enfermaron, sufrieron secuelas o fallecieron. ¿Por qué? ¿Qué dicen realmente los prospectos oficiales publicados por el MSP? ¿Qué aprobaciones regulatorias tienen estas vacunas? ¿Por qué unas franjas etarias reciben cobert

2👍1

24 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @LibertadSanitariaUyPhoto

¿Fe pública o certificado trucho? El Estado impone vacunas obligatorias. Nos coacciona con el Certificado de Vacunación para obtener otros documentos oficiales. Los jueces lo exigen a las familias que rechazan la vacunación de sus hijos. Pero ¿qué sucede cuando está enmendado, exhibe un calendario de vacunación desactualizado, registra vacunas distintas de las previstas y no deja constancia de por qué se apartó de

24 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

En relación a la publicación anterior y entendiendo que fue una investigación a cargo de uno de los mejores Bioquímicos y biólogos genetistas de nuestro Uruguay, Claudio Martinez Debat, quien se ocupó de los análisis bioquímicos y los textos nacionales, compartimos información que es de urgente difusión. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbuDvyzP-yk.

👍3🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ct40doc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CT40 documental 🎥 Canal” (@ct40doc), 457 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ct40doc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.