Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки дилетанта&ЦСКА

@cskabelgorod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

447subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851158369
TypeChannel
Username@cskabelgorod
DescriptionМнение и новости о ПФК ЦСКА и РПЛ. Связь с админом @Sanych0022
Created10 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cskabelgorod

Growth

4477 Aug 2026, 19:49 — 447 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:03 — 447 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:498 Aug 2026, 05:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 446–448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:03447no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:49447first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 447 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,375
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,460
Videos
513
Links
1,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
533.3%
👎320.0%
👏320.0%
🤬213.3%
👍16.67%
😡16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SpasiboMax

ЦСКА продолжает работу по центрфорварду, это главная задача на текущее трансферное окно. Действительно рассматривали Беграуи, и лично для меня этот вариант, пожалуй, звучит интереснее Жуана. Говорят, с Бергауи сорвалось уже на начальной стадии по понятным причинам – не все готовы работать с клубами из России. Однако по моей информации, несмотря на вышесказанное, вариант не закрыт, как об этом пишут. Скоро узнаем, мно

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC42 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @karpinsidePhoto

🇷🇺🇹🇷 Генчлербирлиги проиграл дело о выплатах ЦСКА за Койта: турчане кинули жалобу на собственный трансферный бан из-за сорвавшегося платежа армейцам, но ФИФА оставила решение в силе. Клубы уже согласовали способ расчетов за малийца, по итогам которого 2-й транш за аренду (€200к) все же долетит до Песчаной на следующей неделе. Срок оплаты за Койта истек у Генчлербирлиги еще в феврале, после чего красно-черные пропал

6 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рейс в символической сборной 1 тура Пути РПЛ

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Василий Казарцев - главный арбитр ЦСКА - "Ростов" VAR - Павел Шадыханов

6 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Игру ЦСКА - "Ростов" покажут по Матч ТВ! Комментаторы: Нагучев, Пойда

6 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сколько забьет нам?

👎3🤬2😡1

5 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @karpinsidePhoto

⚽ Мартирена в списках ЦСКА | Игдисамову нравится Рожков + есть варик с Пестряковым | Срыв перехода Гонду в Боку: эти и другие Инсайды от Карпа по главным слухам вокруг ЦСКА специально для коней и не только — прямо с Песчаной. Переговоры по 26-летнему уругвайкому ПЗ из Расинга действительно стартовали, но на сегодняшний день не продвигаются. Еще есть варианты с 21-летним Рожковым из Рубина (об этом писал Панк), котор

4 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC64 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pervsportVideo

❗️Фанаты ЦСКА послали своего же спортивного директора во время матча с «Локомотивом»: на игре Кубка России, где пока не требуется Fan ID, вся трибуна «армейцев» скандировала «Иди на х*й, Женя Шевелёв!». На неделе у ЦСКА сорвался трансфер форварда «Гёзтепе» Жуана: москвичи согласились купить бразильца за 15 млн евро, но затем тренер турецкого клуба сообщил, что у ЦСКА вообще не было денег на этот трансфер. За последни

4 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC78 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бориско отбил - ЦСКА победил!

5

4 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Итог был предсказан ещё днём 😉

👏3

4 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026

Морозов ✅ Обляков ✅ Бакаев ✅ Круговой ✅ Голубев ✅ Козлов ✅ Батраков ✅ Попович ✅ Сильянов ❌ Мусаев ✅

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cskabelgorod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки дилетанта&ЦСКА” (@cskabelgorod), 447 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cskabelgorod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.