Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ִִ ׄ. ໑ ℭ𝗋ỿׄ𝑠𝐭𝖺𝑙 ᭙𝑎̶𐐷ꫀ ֪ ྀ ׄ.

Channel

ִִ ׄ. ໑ ℭ𝗋ỿׄ𝑠𝐭𝖺𝑙 ᭙𝑎̶𐐷ꫀ ֪ ྀ ׄ.

@crystalwave_gg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002554565741
TypeChannel
Username@crystalwave_gg
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crystalwave_gg

Growth

2292352327 August 2026 — 235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 235 subscribers14 August 2026 — 229 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:09229-6
8 Aug 2026, 10:02235no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:17235first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

322 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52515944070392313236319.6%
custom 52585004009185872415416.8%
custom 52471772178588983764012.4%
custom 52468451009227982803711.5%
custom 53232653122866036903611.2%
custom 54674196790541330013410.6%
custom 5422873888872758210299.01%
custom 5467687947006410671299.01%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crystalwave_gg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 February 2026 to 16 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2026, 12:43 UTC365 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52468451009227982807custom 54676879470064106714custom 53232653122866036903custom 52471772178588983762custom 52515944070392313232custom 52585004009185872412custom 54228738888727582102custom 54674196790541330011

13 Mar 2026, 19:45 UTC506 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🌟тꪮ мы 🍫 для тебя ?? . . . 🍫 – – любимая ои группа 🌙 – – мью 💎 – – вы фанат, ждете нью каверы 📼 – – не знаете нас, но хотели бы следить ✍️ – – узнали о нас из пч 🎀🎀🎀 🎀🎀🎀🎀 🐾 Ставьте подходящую реакцию !! – ➖· ➿ ⟡ ➿ · ➖ – ✨ — はた ; #INTERACTIVE #OI #CWAWE🎀🎀

custom 525850040091858724116custom 524717721785889837613custom 52515944070392313236custom 53232653122866036904custom 54228738888727582104custom 52468451009227982802custom 54674196790541330012custom 54676879470064106712

8 Mar 2026, 08:53 UTC372 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀 Дорогие кристалс, мы всей группой поздравляем вас с 8 марта. Оставайтесь такими же прекрасными котятами, мы вас любим! 🥰

custom 52471772178588983767custom 52468451009227982804custom 52515944070392313232custom 54674196790541330012custom 54676879470064106712custom 52585004009185872411custom 53232653122866036901custom 54228738888727582101

7 Mar 2026, 06:34 UTC318 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🐾 ОМГ ! НАШ НОВЫЙ КАВЕР УЖЕ В ТИК ТОКЕ ➡️ ТЫК🤩

custom 54674196790541330017custom 52515944070392313234custom 52471772178588983763custom 52468451009227982801custom 52585004009185872411custom 54228738888727582101custom 54676879470064106711

6 Mar 2026, 10:04 UTC384 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🎀🌟𝐈𝐊𝐓О𝗞 🌑 🎀 ⚫️сех приветствуем, кристалс ! С вами Кристал вэйв ✔️ 🤩 — Хотим сообщить вам о Том что мы открыли новый тик ток аккаунт, на котором теперь будут выходить все наши основные каверы и видео !! Там кстати уже есть наш новый шуточный кавер на Jellious . Бегом смотреть!!!!🦴 🎀 ➡️our 𝔗𝐈𝐊𝐓О𝗞 ➡️our 𝐓G :: @crystalwave_gg 🎀🎀 🎀🥹🥹 ❤️🤩 𝖠r⃨𝖾 𝑦𝑜𝗎 𝖺𝗅𝑖𝑣𝑒 ¿ ` . * 🌙 . – ➖· ➿ ⟡ ➿ · ➖ – ✨ — はた ; #TIK

custom 53232653122866036906custom 54676879470064106714custom 52468451009227982803custom 52585004009185872413custom 52471772178588983762custom 52515944070392313232custom 54228738888727582102custom 54674196790541330012

22 Feb 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,270 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🎀💊🌟ᧉᤐׄ 🤩𝑟𝑎 💎🤩🤩 🖤🖤🖤🖤🤩🖤🖤🖤🖤 𓈒 ✍️ はた 😻 🥹🥹ׅ⠀ׅ 𖧧⠀៹ » ۫ 𐔌 🤩𝑟ỿׄ᥉𝑡𝑎𝓁 🌙 ᤐׄ𝑎ບׄᦸ࣪ 🤩 🤩 - Ꮁᴩуᴨᴨᴀ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴀя 🎀 ᴀᴄᴄᴏцииᴩуᴇᴛᴄя ᴋᴀᴋ ᴦᴧᴏᴛᴏᴋ ✨ ᴄʙᴇжᴇᴦᴏ ʙᴏɜдухᴀ 🤩⊹ Soft and c𝘂ׄ͜𝘁͜𝗲🌟 & 🤩 𝑆𝑜𝑘𝑘𝑦 * 𝐾𝑖𝑦𝑢𝑚𝑖 ` 🎀 🎀 🎀 𝐵𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒 𝑅𝑢𝑚𝑖 ` ✨ — 통신 ; #OIGROUP #NEWERA #𝖢𝖶𝖠𝖵𝖤

custom 525159440703923132335custom 525850040091858724122custom 532326531228660369012custom 52471772178588983767custom 54674196790541330017custom 54228738888727582106custom 52468451009227982805custom 54676879470064106715

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @crystalwave_gg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,469,755 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ִִ ׄ. ໑ ℭ𝗋ỿׄ𝑠𝐭𝖺𝑙 ᭙𝑎̶𐐷ꫀ ֪ ྀ ׄ.” (@crystalwave_gg), 229 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crystalwave_gg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.