Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Zhaba

@cryptozhaba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

853subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001687291012
TypeChannel
Username@cryptozhaba
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptozhaba

Growth

853854853.57 Aug 2026, 05:24 — 854 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:31 — 854 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:28 — 853 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:247 Aug 2026, 20:28
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 853–854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:28853-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:31854no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:24854first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1235.3%
😭720.6%
👍617.6%
🍾38.82%
25.88%
12.94%
❤‍🔥12.94%
👎12.94%
😢12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Feb 2026, 13:39 UTC205 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Еще немого и будем нфт флипать по 5 копеек

1

31 Dec 2025, 22:01 UTC375 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вы че, падлы, думали я о вас забыл?

31 Dec 2025, 22:01 UTC365 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

New Year. New plans. New ambitions. New goals.

🍾3

25 Oct 2025, 17:12 UTC405 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Понемногу восстанавливаю актив в твитаке - мой твиттер Подпишусь взаимно только «+» кидайте в чат и нейм свой, а то у меня не показывает кто подписался

👍1

23 Oct 2025, 17:33 UTC333 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рикки и Арсений, вам не стыдно? Сидите там где-то в Португалии и скамите челиков еще Кукася бы подписали P.s. скам это. Они не будут писать вам в директ (если только денег на додеп не будет)

👍4😁1

23 Oct 2025, 07:52 UTC280 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В CS2 вышла обнова которая убила прайс ножиков, но апнула прайс на красные Скорее всего цена на красные дальше и будет расти, думаю, как буду дома прикуплю себе в долгий холд. DYOR

1

22 Oct 2025, 15:08 UTC284 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Neuko Типы, у меня сейчас нету возможности проанализировать проект. Фаст анализ: • За проектом следят плотненькие челики • Овнеры: squinch, qreenie, austin, rohan • Первый пост закинули 13 октября + сайт не робочий (возможно только у меня) • Скорее всего проект будет на ETH Если чет вам известно пишите в чат и не выебывайтесь Twitter

👍1

20 Oct 2025, 10:18 UTC244 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Гм, бойсы. А какой актив у вас в твитаке и как вы его апнули? Когда-то был неплохой актив на моем акке, перестал им заниматься и сейчас актив упал. Хочу узнать фишки ваши, как поднимались и т.д. Мой твиттер - тык

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptozhaba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 488,784 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Zhaba” (@cryptozhaba), 853 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptozhaba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.